The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Populist Attitudes, Political Trust, and External Political Efficacy: Old Wine in New Bottles?
Open accessAbstract
Substantial scholarly attention has been devoted to explaining why voters support populist parties. Recently, a new concept has been introduced to gauge populism among voters and to explain voting for populist parties: populist attitudes. However, some researchers regard populist attitudes as simply another measurement of existing and established concepts such as political trust and external political efficacy. Using data from the Netherlands (2018), this article addresses the relationship between these concepts, both theoretically and empirically. This article examines whether political trust, external political efficacy, and populist attitudes tap into different latent dimensions. Using a confirmatory factor analysis, we show that populist attitudes are not old wine in new bottles and that they tap into different underlying attitudes than political trust and external political efficacy. Furthermore, we show that the three measures are not only different constructs but also relate differently to populist voting preferences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788
Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling
Tabri, N., & Elliott, C. M. (2012) · Canadian Graduate Journal of Sociology and Criminology · doi:10.15353/cgjsc-rcessc.v1i1.25 · Cited by 38,891
lavaan : An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling
Rosseel, Y. (2012) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i02 · Cited by 27,955
(1997) · Chemometrics in Environmental Analysis · doi:10.1002/352760216x.ch5 · Cited by 18,653
Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research
(2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-2769 · Cited by 15,614
Mudde, C. (2004) · Government and Opposition · doi:10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x · Cited by 5,286
Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe
Mudde, C. (2007) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511492037 · Cited by 4,694
Populism: A Very Short Introduction
Mudde, C., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2017) · doi:10.1093/actrade/9780190234874.001.0001 · Cited by 3,659
Test Theory: A Unified Treatment
Zwick, R., & McDonald, R. P. (2000) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2669496 · Cited by 3,603
The Oxford Handbook of Populism
(2017) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198803560.001.0001 · Cited by 1,787
Cited by
Cultural Backlash? How (Not) to Explain the Rise of Authoritarian Populism
Schäfer, A. (2022) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123421000363 · Cited by 126
Metadata
- Authors
- Geurkink, B., Zaslove, A., Sluiter, R., & Jacobs, K.
- Venue
- Political Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2019-04-23
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 247-267
- ISSN
- 0032-3217 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9248
- OpenAlex
- W2942048673
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 122.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Populist Attitudes, Political Trust, and External Political Efficacy: Old Wine in New Bottles? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0032321719842768
- The paper
- Geurkink, B., Zaslove, A., Sluiter, R., & Jacobs, K. (2020). Populist Attitudes, Political Trust, and External Political Efficacy: Old Wine in New Bottles? Political Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321719842768
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.