The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deliberative Impacts: The Macro-Political Uptake of Mini-Publics
Open accessAbstract
Democratic theorists often place deliberative innovations such as citizen's panels, consensus conferences, planning cells, and deliberative polls at the center of their hopes for deliberative democratization. In light of experience to date, the authors chart the ways in which such mini-publics may have an impact in the “macro” world of politics. Impact may come in the form of actually making policy, being taken up in the policy process, informing public debates, market-testing of proposals, legitimation of public policies, building confidence and constituencies for policies, popular oversight, and resisting co-option. Exposing problems and failures is all too easy. The authors highlight cases of success on each of these dimensions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-2963 · Cited by 3,601
MANSBRIDGE, J. (2003) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055403000856 · Cited by 1,825
Democracy and deliberation: new directions for democratic reform
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-6564 · Cited by 1,497
The voice of the people: public opinion and democracy
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-4782 · Cited by 1,239
Considered Opinions: Deliberative Polling in Britain
LUSKIN, R. C., FISHKIN, J. S., & JOWELL, R. (2002) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123402000194 · Cited by 702
Gastil, J., & Levine, P. (2005) · Works - Scholarship, Research, & Creative Expression (Swarthmore College) · Cited by 618
Public participation in science : the role of consensus conferences in Europe
Joss, S., & Durant, J. (1995) · OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) · Cited by 503
Who deliberates?: mass media in modern democracy
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-1829 · Cited by 429
Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations
Schultz, D., & Binghamton University State University of New York (2003) · International Studies in Philosophy · doi:10.5840/intstudphil200335475 · Cited by 429
DIRECT DEMOCRACY: New Approaches to Old Questions
Lupia, A., & Matsusaka, J. G. (2004) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.012003.104730 · Cited by 408
Cited by
Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse
Schmidt, V. A. (2008) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342 · Cited by 3,388
Developing a framework for responsible innovation
Stilgoe, J., Owen, R., & Macnaghten, P. (2013) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008 · Cited by 3,184
Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical Political Science
Thompson, D. F. (2008) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.081306.070555 · Cited by 987
Democratic innovations: designing institutions for citizen participation
(2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-5275 · Cited by 915
Governance-driven democratization
Warren, M. E. (2009) · Critical Policy Studies · doi:10.1080/19460170903158040 · Cited by 403
Metadata
- Authors
- Goodin, R. E., & Dryzek, J. S.
- Venue
- Politics & Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 219-244
- ISSN
- 0032-3292 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7514
- OpenAlex
- W1972239913
- Cited by
- 984
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 79.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deliberative Impacts: The Macro-Political Uptake of Mini-Publics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0032329206288152
- The paper
- Goodin, R. E., & Dryzek, J. S. (2006). Deliberative Impacts: The Macro-Political Uptake of Mini-Publics. Politics & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329206288152
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.