The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Governance-driven democratization
Abstract
While democratic reforms of electoral institutions continue, their capacities for deepening democracy are limited by the large, pluralized, complex, and territorial political units through which they work. Much of the institutional innovation in democracy has shifted elsewhere – into ‘governance’, the development and administration of public policy. The democratic potentials of governance reside in the potentially responsive linkages between what governments do and what citizens receive. From the perspective of democratic theory, however, this ‘governance driven-democratization’ is a frontier. Concepts inherited from participatory democratic theory such as citizen engagement and direct democracy obscure more than they reveal. Most of the new experiments engage a relatively few citizens. Many involve only self-selected stakeholders and activists, and so by-pass broader public interests, or generate new forms of exclusion. In this paper, I specify the concept and domains of governance-driven democratization, and suggest a method for critical assessment. We can ask, on a case by case basis, about opportunities and dangers as measured by the democratic values of inclusion of the affected, empowerment, representation, and deliberation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy
Habermas, J. (1996) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1564.001.0001 · Cited by 9,998
The theory of communicative action
(2014) · The Philosophy of Habermas · doi:10.4324/9781315710495-5 · Cited by 8,634
(2005) · Cited by 3,670
Between facts and norms: contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-2995 · Cited by 3,574
Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence
Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511790881 · Cited by 2,596
The theory of communicative action
(2005) · The Philosophy of Habermas · doi:10.1017/upo9781844653539.007 · Cited by 2,271
Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society
(2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511490934 · Cited by 1,751
Democratic Innovations: Designing Institutions for Citizen Participation
Smith, G. (2009) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609848 · Cited by 1,309
Enfranchising All Affected Interests, and Its Alternatives
GOODIN, R. E. (2007) · Philosophy & Public Affairs · doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.2007.00098.x · Cited by 1,157
Fung, A. (2003) · Journal of Political Philosophy · doi:10.1111/1467-9760.00181 · Cited by 998
Cited by
Enhancing Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector
Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2011) · Administration & Society · doi:10.1177/0095399711418768 · Cited by 931
A problem-based approach to democratic theory
WARREN, M. E. (2017) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055416000605 · Cited by 478
Self-citationDeliberative democracy and the climate crisis
Willis, R., Curato, N., & Smith, G. (2022) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.759 · Cited by 253
Voting with your feet: Exit-based empowerment in democratic theory
WARREN, M. E. (2011) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055411000323 · Cited by 188
Self-citationPeters, B. G. (2010) · Public Organization Review · doi:10.1007/s11115-010-0133-4 · Cited by 164
Metadata
- Authors
- Warren, M. E.
- Venue
- Critical Policy Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-11-09
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-13
- ISSN
- 1946-0171 (ISSN-L)
- 1946-018X
- OpenAlex
- W1982313706
- Cited by
- 403
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 53.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Governance-driven democratization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/19460170903158040
- The paper
- Warren, M. E. (2009). Governance-driven democratization. Critical Policy Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460170903158040
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.