The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On the Concept of Populism: Populist and Clientelist Modes of Incorporation in Semiperipheral Polities
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“What makes populists distinctive is not their beliefs but the unmediated way in which they mobilize political support”
From Post-Populism: Transitions from Populist to Personalist Authoritarian Rule (2023) · cites this paper as Mouzelis, 1985
Citations
Cited by
“The Enemy of the People”: Populists and Press Freedom
Kenny, P. D. (2020) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1065912918824038 · Cited by 98
Post-Populism: Transitions from Populist to Personalist Authoritarian Rule
Balta, E., Baturo, A., & Kenny, P. (2023) · doi:10.33774/apsa-2023-zpppw · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Mouzelis, N.
- Corresponding author
- Mouzelis, Nicos
- Venue
- Politics & Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1985-09
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 329-348
- ISSN
- 0032-3292 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7514
- OpenAlex
- W1963969065
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Politics & Society (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Politics and Society in Latin America
- Keywords
- populism, clientelism, political incorporation, political elites
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the Concept of Populism: Populist and Clientelist Modes of Incorporation in Semiperipheral Polities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/003232928501400303
- The paper
- Mouzelis, N. (1985). On the Concept of Populism: Populist and Clientelist Modes of Incorporation in Semiperipheral Polities. Politics & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/003232928501400303
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
