The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social Support, Gender, and Inmate Adjustment to Prison Life: Insights From a National Sample
Abstract
Although living in prison is difficult for all inmates, anecdotal evidence and a small number of qualitative studies on women's prisons suggest that females have greater social support needs while incarcerated. This claim is important for a more complete understanding of adjustment to prisons. In particular, extra and intrainstitutional social support mechanisms may reduce the inmate-perceived stresses associated with imprisonment and yield fewer official rule infractions. Using a multilevel analysis, the authors explore ties between social support mechanisms and reported rules infractions of a nationally representative sample of male and female state prison inmates. Findings suggest that female inmates experienced more social support than did their male counterparts. Some of the included social support mechanisms seem to affect inmates'adjustment to prison, and the effect of marital status on misconduct varies by gender. The implications of these findings for understanding prison life and for prison administrators are also examined.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods.
Longford, N. T., Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1993) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2075823 · Cited by 18,724
Structural Equations with Latent Variables.
Clogg, C. C., & Bollen, K. A. (1991) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2072165 · Cited by 17,442
Structural Equations with Latent Variables
Bollen, K. A. (1989) · Wiley series in probability and statistics · doi:10.1002/9781118619179 · Cited by 17,277
Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach
Wooldridge, J. M. (1999) · Cited by 14,346
Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods
Davidian, M. (2003) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/jasa.2003.s288 · Cited by 13,723
Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables.
MTW, & Long, J. S. (1997) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2965458 · Cited by 6,898
Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables
Calvin, J. A. (1998) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1998.10485496 · Cited by 5,201
Perceived support, received support, and adjustment to stressful life events
Wethington, E., & Kessler, R. C. (1986) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2136504 · Cited by 1,431
Poisson-Based Regression Analysis of Aggregate Crime Rates
Osgood, D. W. (2000) · Journal of Quantitative Criminology · doi:10.1023/a:1007521427059 · Cited by 1,085
Thieves, Convicts and the Inmate Culture
Irwin, J., & Cressey, D. R. (1962) · Social Problems · doi:10.1525/sp.1962.10.2.03a00040 · Cited by 1,056
Cited by
Nowotny, K. M. (2017) · Health & Justice · doi:10.1186/s40352-017-0052-3 · Cited by 37
Systemic Oppression and the Contested Ground of Information Access for Incarcerated People
Austin, J., Charenko, M., Dillon, M., & Lincoln, J. (2020) · Open Information Science · doi:10.1515/opis-2020-0013 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Jiang, S., & Winfree, L. T.
- Venue
- The Prison Journal
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 32-55
- ISSN
- 0032-8855 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7522
- OpenAlex
- W2100725195
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 53
- FWCI
- 21.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social Support, Gender, and Inmate Adjustment to Prison Life: Insights From a National Sample. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0032885505283876
- The paper
- Jiang, S., & Winfree, L. T. (2006). Social Support, Gender, and Inmate Adjustment to Prison Life: Insights From a National Sample. The Prison Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885505283876
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.