Cited by 67Stress and Burnout ResearchJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorWorkplace Health and Well-being

Problems at work: Exploring the correlates of role stress among correctional staff

Lambert, Eric G., Hogan, Nancy L., Tucker, Kasey A.·2009·The Prison Journal

Abstract

There is a large body of literature that strongly suggests that role stress is harmful to correctional staff. Past research has found that role stress is linked to lower job satisfaction, lower organizational commitment, greater job stress, and intention to quit. The bulk of the literature has looked at the consequences of role stress; this study examined the potential antecedents of role stress for correctional staff. While controlling for the shared effects of the personal characteristics of gender, age, position, tenure, educational level, race, and supervisory status, this study examined whether different aspects of the work environment (i.e., input into decision making, supervision, formalization, integration, job performance, and instrumental communication) were linked to role stress using survey data of correctional staff at a Midwestern prison. Ordinary least squares multiple regression analysis indicated that the personal characteristics of position and tenure had statistically significant associations with role stress. Specifically, noncustody staff and staff with higher tenure reported greater role stress than custody staff and staff with less tenure. With regard to the work environment variables, input into decision making, supervision, formalization, integration, and instrumental communication all had a significant negative relationship with role stress, whereas job performance feedback did not.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0032885509351006

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Correctional work involves a hierarchical, rank-informed relationship between different staff and administration, and that organizational structure arguably facilitates stress, job dissatisfaction, and burnout.

    “For example, correctional work involves a hierarchical, rank-informed, relationship between different staff and the administration, and that organizational structure arguably facilitates stress, job dissatisfaction, and even burnout [23,24,25,26].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lambert, E. G., Hogan, N. L., & Tucker, K. A.
Affiliations
  • Wayne State University (US)
  • Ferris State University (US)
  • University of Toledo (US)
Corresponding author
Lambert, Eric G.
Venue
The Prison Journal
Published
2009-11-05
Volume
89
Issue
4
Pages
460-481
ISSN
  • 0032-8855 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7522
OpenAlex
W2078702568
Cited by
67
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 12
FWCI
6.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Prison Journal (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Justice
  • National Institute of Justice
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
Keywords
role stress, prison staff, occupational stress, job satisfaction, organizational commitment, job tenure, job position, decision-making, supervision, organizational formalization, organizational integration, instrumental communication, work environment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review