Cited by 23Social and Intergroup PsychologyHuman-Animal Interaction StudiesAnimal Behavior and Welfare Studies

Black Cat Bias: Prevalence and Predictors

Jones, Haylie D., Hart, Christian L.·2020·Psychological Reports

Abstract

There is anecdotal and empirical evidence for black cat bias, the phenomenon where cats ( Felis silvestris catus) with black coats are viewed more negatively, adopted less often, and euthanized more often than lighter colored cats. Despite the anecdotal claims, there is scarce empirical evidence for black cat bias. Using evaluations of cat photos, the researchers examined differences in people’s attitudes toward black and non-black cats of various colorations on measures of perceived aggression, perceived friendliness, and willingness to adopt. The researchers also explored whether participants’ levels of religiosity, superstitious beliefs, and prejudicial racial attitudes were related to black cat bias. Finally, the researchers explored whether black cat bias was related to difficulties people had in reading the emotions of black cats compared to non-black cats. This study provided evidence of black cat bias in the sample. People exhibiting higher degrees of black cat bias had higher levels of superstition, but not religiosity or racial prejudice. Additionally, people who had difficulty reading the emotions of black cats tended to exhibit a stronger bias against adopting black cats.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0033294119844982

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jones, H. D., & Hart, C. L.
Affiliations
Texas Woman's University (US)
Corresponding author
Hart, Christian L.
Venue
Psychological Reports
Published
2019-04-29
Volume
123
Issue
4
Pages
1198-1206
ISSN
  • 0033-2941 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-691X
OpenAlex
W2942902405
Cited by
23
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
5.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Keywords
colorism, animal coloration, perceived aggression, perceived friendliness, pet adoption, superstition, religiosity, racial prejudice, emotion perception, animal attitudes
MeSH terms
Adult, Animals, Cats, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prejudice, Religion, Superstitions, Young Adult, Pets

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review