Cited by 178Human-Animal Interaction StudiesAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesAnimal Law and Welfare

Why Did You Choose This Pet?: Adopters and Pet Selection Preferences in Five Animal Shelters in the United States

Open access
Weiss, Emily, Miller, Katherine, Mohan-Gibbons, Heather, Vela, Carla·2012·Animals

Abstract

Responses from an adopter survey (n = 1,491) determined reasons for pet selection, type of information received by the adopter, and the context in which the animal’s behavior was observed. Appearance of the animal, social behavior with adopter, and personality were the top reasons for adoption across species and age groups. Most adopters stated that information about the animal from a staff member or volunteer was more important than information on cage cards, and health and behavior information was particularly important. Adopters found greater importance in interacting with the animal rather than viewing it in its kennel. The results of this study can be used by shelters to create better adoption matches, prioritize shelter resources and staff training, and potentially increase adoptions. Additionally, some simple training techniques are suggested to facilitate adopter-friendly behaviors from sheltered dogs and cats.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ani2020144

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evidence suggests that physical appearance outperforms health considerations when acquiring a dog.

    “Evidence suggests that physical appearance outperforms health considerations when acquiring a dog [104,105].”

    From Ethical Concerns about Fashionable Dog Breeding (2024) · cites this paper as [105]

    The Results report that appearance was the most frequently cited single reason for adopting a dog (27.3%), supporting the emphasis on appearance. But the study concerns adoptions at five shelters, not dog acquisition generally, and it does not directly compare appearance with health as reasons for choosing a dog. The Discussion also says adopters rated information about a pet’s health as important. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [14]Dybdall K. Strasser R. Measuring Attachment Behavior and Adoption Time in Shelter Cats Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Society of Anthrozoology Indianapolis, IN, USA 4–6 August 2011 65

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weiss, E., Miller, K., Mohan-Gibbons, H., & Vela, C.
Affiliations
  • American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (US)
  • Applied Research and Behavior, Community Outreach, American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA®), 424 E. 92nd St., New York, NY 10128, USA
  • City University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Weiss, Emily
Venue
Animals
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2012-04-10
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
144-159
ISSN
2076-2615 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1989044448
Cited by
178
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Animals (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Social Sciences › Law › Animal Law and Welfare
Keywords
pet adoption, animal shelters, pet selection, animal appearance, social behavior, shelter dogs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review