Work Engagement: A meta-Analysis Using the Job Demands-Resources Model
Abstract
Although the construct of work engagement has been extensively explored, a systematic meta-analysis based on a consistent categorization of engagement antecedents, outcomes, and well-being correlates is still lacking. The results of prior research reporting 533 correlations from 113 independent samples ( k = 94, n = 119,420) were coded using a meta-analytic approach. The effect size for development resources ( r = .45) and personal resources ( r = .48) was higher than for social resources ( r = .36) and for job resources ( r = .37). Among the outcomes and well-being correlates explored, the effect size was highest for job satisfaction ( r = .60) and commitment ( r = .63). Furthermore, moderation analysis showed that (a) concerning the occupational role, work engagement finds a low association with turnover intention among civil servants, volunteer workers, and educators; (b) collectivist cultural environments reported a greater association of feedback with engagement than individualistic environments; (c) the relationship between personal resources and engagement was stronger among workers with university degrees than workers with high school diplomas. Furthermore, the absorption dimension showed a lower effect with all variables under investigation than vigor and dedication.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis
Higgins, J. P. T., & Thompson, S. G. (2002) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1186 · Cited by 36,763 · see citing works
The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01 · Cited by 34,210 · see citing works
Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x · Cited by 14,099 · see citing works
The Job Demands‐Resources model: state of the art
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/02683940710733115 · Cited by 12,996 · see citing works
Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi‐sample study
Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.248 · Cited by 9,297 · see citing works
Self-citationJob demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward.
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/ocp0000056 · Cited by 6,979 · see citing works
Cohen, J. (1992) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-8721.ep10768783 · Cited by 5,870 · see citing works
Burnout and Engagement in University Students: A Cross-National Study
Schaufeli, W. B., Martínez, I. M., Pinto, A. M., Salanova, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2002) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022102033005003 · Cited by 3,418 · see citing works
Self-citationApplying the Job Demands-Resources model
Schaufeli, W. B. (2017) · Organizational Dynamics · doi:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2017.04.008 · Cited by 1,026 · see citing works
Self-citationThe effect of authentic leadership on employee trust and employee engagement
Wang, D.-S., & Hsieh, C.-C. (2013) · Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal · doi:10.2224/sbp.2013.41.4.613 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Wefald, A. J., Mills, M. J., Smith, M. R., & Downey, R. G. (2012) · Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being · doi:10.1111/j.1758-0854.2011.01059.x · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Kuba, K., & Scheibe, S. (2017) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0040149 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Simbula, S., Margheritti, S., & Avanzi, L. (2023) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs13020083 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
A meta-analysis of teacher well-being: A job demands and resources perspective
Li, Y., Chen, J., Lu, J., & Wang, X. (2025) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100719 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mazzetti, G., Robledo, E., Vignoli, M., Topa, G., Guglielmi, D., & Schaufeli, W. B.
- Venue
- Psychological Reports
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2021-12-10
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1069-1107
- ISSN
- 0033-2941
- 1558-691X
- Cited by
- 559
- References
- 12
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
