Cited by 71Electronic Health Records SystemsMedical Coding and Health InformationHealth disparities and outcomes

Incorporating Geospatial Capacity within Clinical Data Systems to Address Social Determinants of Health

Open access
Comer, Karen Frederickson, Grannis, Shaun, Dixon, Brian E., Bodenhamer, David J., Wiehe, Sarah E.·2011·Public Health Reports®

Abstract

Linking electronic health record (EHR) systems with community information systems (CIS) holds great promise for addressing inequities in social determinants of health (SDH). While EHRs are rich in location-specific data that allow us to uncover geographic inequities in health outcomes, CIS are rich in data that allow us to describe community-level characteristics relating to health. When meaningfully integrated, these data systems enable clinicians, researchers, and public health professionals to actively address the social etiologies of health disparities. This article describes a process for exploring SDH by geocoding and integrating EHR data with a comprehensive CIS covering a large metropolitan area. Because the systems were initially designed for different purposes and had different teams of experts involved in their development, integrating them presents challenges that require multidisciplinary expertise in informatics, geography, public health, and medicine. We identify these challenges and the means of addressing them and discuss the significance of the project as a model for similar projects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/00333549111260s310

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing research has explored integrating patient SDoH data with geospatial datasets like census demographics and social vulnerability index (SVI) to estimate SDoH factors at a community or neighborhood level.

    “Existing research has also explored integrating patient SDoH data with geospatial datasets like census demographics and social vulnerability index (SVI) to estimate SDoH factors at a community or neighborhood level41–44.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 64 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Comer, K. F., Grannis, S., Dixon, B. E., Bodenhamer, D. J., & Wiehe, S. E.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
  • Regenstrief Institute (US)
Venue
Public Health Reports®
Published
2011-09
Volume
126
Issue
3_suppl
Pages
54-61
ISSN
  • 0033-3549 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2877
OpenAlex
W1592969533
Cited by
71
References
64
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
6.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Public Health Reports (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
social determinants of health, electronic health records, community information systems, data integration, geocoding, health disparities, health information technology
MeSH terms
Data Collection, Humans, Information Systems, Public Health, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Socioeconomic Factors, Medical Records Systems, Computerized, Geographic Information Systems, Health Status Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review