Cited by 22Public Health Policies and EducationHealthcare Systems and PracticesHealth and Medical Education

Better Health Faster: The 5 Essential Public Health Law Services

Open access
Burris, Scott, Ashe, Marice, Blanke, Doug, Ibrahim, Jennifer, Levin, Donna E., Matthews, Gene, Penn, Matthew, Katz, Martha·2016·Public Health Reports®

Abstract

law, evidence-based policy, translation, public health law research, metrics, legal epidemiology, public health law practice It is easy to identify health laws that have helped Americans live longer, healthier lives.Indeed, most of the greatest public health accomplishments of the last century depended on legal action.The coordination of research, policy development, public education, and advocacy in the tobacco control movement shows that success is attainable even in the face of powerful industry opposition. 1 The development of automobile safety laws during the past 30 years shows how well-conducted, properly diffused research can instigate policy cascades and guide policy refinement over time. 2 These examples of ''interventional health law'' 3 -using law as a tool of intervention-also illustrate that developing, enacting, evaluating, and spreading health laws is not just the work of lawyers.In these and many examples like them, health advocates, researchers, public health practitioners, and lawyers work in strategic partnership to improve population health through law and policy.Consistent with the literature on the art and science of evidence translation, 4,5 these efforts were built on effective practices, such as cultivating partnerships among diverse stakeholders.These partnerships promote (1) research that is targeted at the most strategically relevant questions; (2) the development of model laws based on the best available science; (3) sophisticated community education and advocacy campaigns to win, defend, and enforce effective policies; and (4) enforcement to ensure that improved public health outcomes are achieved and sustained.[6][7][8] The starting point for this commentary is that public health law is not just the work of lawyers but must also be owned by the range of public health disciplines as a transdisciplinary activity.9 Knowing how to translate what we have learned from research and experience into effective public health law interventions is not the problem.The problem is that the public health system, writ large, does not deploy wellrecognized best practices consistently or strategically across topics.Legal interventions affecting millions of Americans are often not scaled or evaluated for years, if at all.Innovations that show promise in research or practice do not spread, or they spread too slowly.10,11 The pace can be even slower when innovations are faced with organized ideological or industry opposition.12 Success requires investment in the same legal infrastructure that was created for tobacco control and alcohol policy and is newly underway in obesity prevention.''Legal infrastructure'' refers to the people, methods, and tools needed to move a policy from conception to widespread implementation.The first step in establishing this infrastructure is defining its elements.After publication of the 1988 Institute of Medicine (IOM) report The Future of Public Health, 13 public health as a field embarked on an effort to define, measure, and improve the public health system.14,15 Yet, despite its key role, law largely escaped that systematic treatment.Two of the 10 essential public health services explicitly concern legal and policy work: (1) ''develop policies and plans that support individual and community health efforts'' and (2) ''enforce laws and regulations that protect health and ensure safety.''16 A recent review, however, found

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0033354916667496

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Outside of sub-Saharan Africa, up to 30% of all new HIV infections occur among people who inject drugs with unsafe injecting practices.

    “Outside of sub-Saharan Africa, up to 30% of all new HIV infections occur among people who inject drugs with unsafe injecting practices.285”

    From The legal determinants of health: harnessing the power of law for global health and sustainable development (2019) · cites this paper as [285]

    The discussion of syringe exchange programs (Toward a Transdisciplinary Public Health Law Infrastructure, p. 5) does not give an HIV-infection estimate. Searches for the 30% figure, new HIV infections, unsafe injecting, and sub-Saharan Africa found no passage in our copy addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [6]6. Moat KA, Lavis JN. 10 best resources for . . . evidenceinformed health policy making. Health Policy Plan . 2013; 28(2):215-218.
  2. [13]13. Institute of Medicine. The Future of Public Health . Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1988.
  3. [24]24. Institute of Medicine. For the Public's Health: Revitalizing Law and Policy to Meet New Challenges . Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2011.
  4. [4]4. randomization. In: Wagenaar AC, Burris S, eds. Public Health Law Research: Theory and Methods . San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2013:307-324.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burris, S., Ashe, M., Blanke, D., Ibrahim, J., Levin, D. E., Matthews, G., Penn, M., & Katz, M.
Affiliations
  • Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (US)
  • ChangeLab Solutions (US)
  • Hamline University (US)
  • Network for Public Health Law, Saint Paul, MN, USA
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • Georgia Health Foundation (US)
Corresponding author
Burris, Scott
Venue
Public Health Reports®
Published
2016-10-14
Volume
131
Issue
6
Pages
747-753
ISSN
  • 0033-3549 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2877
OpenAlex
W2531506044
Cited by
22
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
5.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Public Health Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare Systems and Practices
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Education
MeSH terms
Health Policy, Humans, Legislation as Topic, Public Health, Public Health Administration, United States, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review