Cited by 53Criminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisCriminal Justice and PenologySubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Age-Standardized Mortality of Persons on Probation, in Jail, or in State Prison and the General Population, 2001-2012

Open access

Abstract

Objectives: The number of adults in the United States being held on probation—persons convicted of crimes and serving their sentence in the community rather than in a correctional facility—approached 4 million at the end of 2016 and continues to grow, yet little is known about the health and well-being of this population. We compared the standardized mortality ratios of persons on probation in the United States with persons in jail, persons in state prison, and the general US population. Methods: We used administrative data from 2001-2012 from the Bureau of Justice Statistics and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention WONDER database and indirect standardization techniques to compare the mortality rates of persons on probation in 15 states with the mortality rates of persons in jail, persons in state prison, and the general US population. We applied the age-specific mortality rates of 3 populations (general US population, persons in jail, and persons in state prison) to the age distribution of persons on probation to estimate standardized mortality ratios. Results: Persons on probation died at a rate 3.42 times higher than persons in jail, 2.81 times higher than persons in state prison, and 2.10 times higher than the general US population, after standardizing the age distribution of persons on probation relative to the other 3 groups. Conclusions: Public health interventions should target persons on probation, who have received less attention from the public health community than persons serving sentences in jails and prisons.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0033354919879732

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Incarceration and any exposure to the criminal legal system is deleterious to individual health.

    “Mounting evidence finds that incarceration – indeed, any exposure to the criminal legal system – is deleterious to individual, family, and community health.”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 27 · Cited by 53

Authors
Wildeman, C., Goldman, A. W., & Wang, E. A.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Wildeman, Christopher
Venue
Public Health Reports®
Published
2019-10-11
Volume
134
Issue
6
Pages
660-666
ISSN
  • 0033-3549 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2877
OpenAlex
W2979807178
Cited by
53
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6
FWCI
11.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Public Health Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001863)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
probation, mortality, standardized mortality ratio, jails, state prisons, incarcerated individuals, health disparities, correctional populations, public health interventions
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mortality, Prisoners, Prisons, Residence Characteristics, United States, Databases, Factual, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review