Age-Standardized Mortality of Persons on Probation, in Jail, or in State Prison and the General Population, 2001-2012
Open accessAbstract
Objectives: The number of adults in the United States being held on probation—persons convicted of crimes and serving their sentence in the community rather than in a correctional facility—approached 4 million at the end of 2016 and continues to grow, yet little is known about the health and well-being of this population. We compared the standardized mortality ratios of persons on probation in the United States with persons in jail, persons in state prison, and the general US population. Methods: We used administrative data from 2001-2012 from the Bureau of Justice Statistics and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention WONDER database and indirect standardization techniques to compare the mortality rates of persons on probation in 15 states with the mortality rates of persons in jail, persons in state prison, and the general US population. We applied the age-specific mortality rates of 3 populations (general US population, persons in jail, and persons in state prison) to the age distribution of persons on probation to estimate standardized mortality ratios. Results: Persons on probation died at a rate 3.42 times higher than persons in jail, 2.81 times higher than persons in state prison, and 2.10 times higher than the general US population, after standardizing the age distribution of persons on probation relative to the other 3 groups. Conclusions: Public health interventions should target persons on probation, who have received less attention from the public health community than persons serving sentences in jails and prisons.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Incarceration and any exposure to the criminal legal system is deleterious to individual health.
“Mounting evidence finds that incarceration – indeed, any exposure to the criminal legal system – is deleterious to individual, family, and community health.”
From Community investment interventions as a means for decarceration: A scoping review (2022) · cites this paper as [5]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 27 · Cited by 53
- Authors
- Wildeman, C., Goldman, A. W., & Wang, E. A.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- Yale University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wildeman, Christopher
- Venue
- Public Health Reports®
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2019-10-11
- Volume
- 134
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 660-666
- ISSN
- 0033-3549 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2877
- PMC
- PMC6832078
- OpenAlex
- W2979807178
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6
- FWCI
- 11.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Public Health Reports (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001863)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Keywords
- probation, mortality, standardized mortality ratio, jails, state prisons, incarcerated individuals, health disparities, correctional populations, public health interventions
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mortality, Prisoners, Prisons, Residence Characteristics, United States, Databases, Factual, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review