Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 176

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Measuring the Vocabulary Knowledge of Second Langauge Learners

Read, John·1988·RELC Journal

Abstract

There is renewed recognition these days of the importance of vocabulary knoweldge for second language learners. This means that it is often necessary to find out, for diagnostic and for research pur poses, how many words are known by particular learners. In order to measure vocabulary size, we need to deal with three methodological problems: defining what a word is; selecting a suitable sample of words for testing; and determining the criterion for knowing a word. A first attempt to produce a diagnostic test of this kind for EAP learners is represented by the Vocabulary Levels Test, which uses a matching format to measure knowledge of words at five frequency levels. The development of the test is outlined, followed by an analysis of the results obtained from a group of learners at Victoria University. Another approach, the checklist, is proposed as an alter native testing format. The literature on the checklist is reviewed, with particular reference to methods of controlling for the tendency of learners to overrate their knowledge of the words.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/003368828801900202

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Anderson, R.C., 1981, International Reading Association
  2. Huston, B., 1983, Reading comprehension and the assessment and acquisition of word knowledge
  3. Barnard, H., 1961, Bulletin of the Central Institute of English, 1, 90
  4. 1971, Advanced English vocabulary. Workbooks 1-3
  5. Campion, M.E., 1971, An academic vocabulary list
  6. 10.1080/00220671.1942.10881160 · DOI
  7. Ghadessy, M., 1979, English Teaching Forum, 17, 24
  8. 10.1093/elt/37.1.62 · DOI
  9. Hatch, E., 1982, Research design and statistics for applied linguistics
  10. Kucera, H., 1967, A computational analysis of present day American English
  11. 10.1080/00220973.1963.11010819 · DOI
  12. 10.1177/003368827300400103 · DOI
  13. Meara, P., 1987, Polyglot, 8, 1
  14. Melka Teichroew, F.J., 1982, Bulletin, 6, 5
  15. 10.2307/747823 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Naton, I.S.P., 1983, Guidelines, 5, 12
  17. 1986, Vocabulary lists: words, affixes and stems
  18. Praninskas, J., 1972, American university word list
  19. Quinn, G., 1968, The English vocabulary of some Indonesian university entrants
  20. Read, J., Paper presented at the 8th World Congress of Applied Linguistics
  21. 10.2307/3585941 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1080/00220671.1929.10879971 · DOI
  23. Thorndike, E.L., 1944, The teacher's word book of 30,000 words
  24. 10.1080/00220973.1936.11010031 · DOI
  25. West, M., 1953, A general service list of English words
  26. Xue, Guo-yi, 1984, Learning and Communication, 3, 215

Cited by

See all 176

Metadata

Authors
Read, J.
Venue
RELC Journal
Published
1988-12
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
12-25
ISSN
  • 0033-6882 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-526X
OpenAlex
W2023550428
Cited by
176
References
1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measuring the Vocabulary Knowledge of Second Langauge Learners. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/003368828801900202
The paper
Read, J. (1988). Measuring the Vocabulary Knowledge of Second Langauge Learners. RELC Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368828801900202

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.