Cited by 6Phonocardiography and Auscultation TechniquesSimulation-Based Education in HealthcareECG Monitoring and Analysis

Development of deep-learning models for a hybrid simulation of auscultation training on standard patients using an ECG-based virtual pathology stethoscope

Yhdego, Haben, Kidane, Nahom, Mckenzie, Frederick, Audette, Michel·2023·SIMULATION

Abstract

Cardiac auscultation (CA), the act of listening to the heart’s sound, is a critical skill that provides valuable information for identifying serious heart diseases. Proficiency in cardiac auscultation requires repeated stethoscope practice and experience in identifying abnormal or irregular cardiac rhythms. However, nowadays, most hospital admissions are short and intensely focused, with fewer opportunities for medical trainees to learn and practice bedside examination skills. It is common practice in many institutions to incorporate standardized patients (SPs) into CA training because these actors are able to represent the patient and convey the symptoms. However, SPs are typically healthy individuals, limiting the kinds of abnormalities that students can hear. In this work, we develop a novel real-time simulation-based method for virtual pathology stethoscope (VPS) detection. The VPS system uses augmented reality (AR) to teach medical students how to perform cardiac examinations by listening to abnormal heart sounds in SPs who are otherwise healthy. A digital stethoscope with two electrodes on the chest piece collects electrocardiogram (ECG) signal data sets from SPs at the four primary auscultation sites. Next, different deep-learning methods are evaluated for classifying the location of the stethoscope by taking advantage of subtle differences in the ECG signals. This study would significantly extend the simulation capabilities of SPs by allowing medical students and trainees to perform realistic CA and hear CA in a clinical environment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/00375497231165049

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fourteen studies (5%) examined the use of AI in simulations.

    “Fourteen studies (5%) examined the use of AI in simulations [90, 120–132].”
  • AR helped teach medical students to identify abnormal heart sounds in standardized patients with normal heart sounds by using a digital stethoscope, utilizing AI deep learning to determine the placement of the stethoscope.

    “AR helped teach medical students to identify abnormal heart sounds in standardized patients with normal heart sounds by using a digital stethoscope, utilizing AI deep learning to determine the placement of the stethoscope [127].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Shaver JA. Cardiac auscultation: a cost-effective diagnostic skill. Curr Probl Cardiol 1995; 20: 441-530.
  2. Karnath B and Thornton W. Auscultation of the heart. Hosp Phys 2002; 38: 39-45.
  3. Vaswani A, Shazeer N, Parmar N, et al. Attention is all you need, 2017, https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2017/file/ 3f5ee243547dee91fbd053c1c4a845aa-Paper.pdf
  4. Yhdego H, Li J, Paolini C, et al. Wearable sensor gait analy- sis of fall detection using attention network. In: Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE international conference on bioinformatics and biomedicine (BIBM), Houston, TX, 9-12 December 2021, pp. 3137-3141. New York: IEEE.
  5. Kazemi SM, Goel R, Eghbali S, et al. Time2Vec: learning a vector representation of time, 2019, https://arxiv.org/abs/ 1907.05321
  6. Bengfort B and Bilbro R. Yellowbrick: visualizing the scikit- learn model selection process. J Open Sour Softw 2019; 4: 1075.
  7. Abadi M, Barham P, Chen J, et al. TensorFlow: a system for large-scale machine learning. OSDI 2016; 16: 265-283.
  8. Li L, Jamieson K, DeSalvo G, et al. Hyperband: a novel bandit-based approach to hyperparameter optimization. J Mach Learn Res 2017; 18: 6765-6816.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yhdego, H., Kidane, N., Mckenzie, F., & Audette, M.
Affiliations
Old Dominion University (US)
Corresponding author
Yhdego, Haben
Venue
SIMULATION
Published
2023-03-29
Volume
99
Issue
9
Pages
903-915
ISSN
  • 0037-5497 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-3133
OpenAlex
W4361277815
Cited by
6
References
20
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
SIMULATION (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Phonocardiography and Auscultation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
Keywords
cardiac auscultation, standardized patients, augmented reality, deep learning, medical training, abnormal heart sounds, hybrid simulation, digital stethoscope

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review