The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Coming Crisis of Empirical Sociology
Abstract
This ar ticle argues that in an age of knowing capitalism, sociologists have not adequately thought about the challenges posed to their expertise by the proliferation of `social' transactional data which are now routinely collected, processed and analysed by a wide variety of private and public institutions. Drawing on British examples, we argue that whereas over the past 40 years sociologists championed innovative methodological resources, notably the sample survey and the in-depth interviews, which reasonably allowed them to claim distinctive expertise to access the `social' in powerful ways, such claims are now much less secure. We argue that both the sample survey and the in-depth interview are increasingly dated research methods, which are unlikely to provide a robust base for the jurisdiction of empirical sociologists in coming decades. We conclude by speculating how sociology might respond to this coming crisis through taking up new interests in the `politics of method'.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory
Latour, B. (2005) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199256044.001.0001 · Cited by 16,778
The New production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-4463 · Cited by 7,046
Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences
Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (1999) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/6352.001.0001 · Cited by 6,188
The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor.
Tolbert, P. S., & Abbott, A. (1990) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393403 · Cited by 5,617
Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences
(2000) · The Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1016/s0099-1333(00)00155-5 · Cited by 5,210
Field Theory in Social Science
French, R. L., Lewin, K., & Cartwright, D. (1953) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1418749 · Cited by 5,190
Governing the soul: the shaping of the private self
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-6033 · Cited by 3,834
Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-Politics, Modernity
Mitchell, T. (2002) · doi:10.1525/9780520928251 · Cited by 3,693
(2005) · Cited by 3,670
Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers.
Price, D. O., Lewin, K., & Cartwright, D. (1951) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2087618 · Cited by 3,501
Cited by
boyd, D., & Crawford, K. (2012) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2012.678878 · Cited by 5,479
A New Model of Social Class? Findings from the BBC’s Great British Class Survey Experiment
Savage, M., Devine, F., Cunningham, N., Taylor, M., Li, Y., Hjellbrekke, J., Le Roux, B., Friedman, S., & Miles, A. (2013) · Sociology · doi:10.1177/0038038513481128 · Cited by 1,303
Self-citationCode/Space: Software and Everyday Life
Kitchin, R., & Dodge, M. (2011) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262042482.001.0001 · Cited by 964
Surveillance, Snowden, and Big Data: Capacities, consequences, critique
Lyon, D. (2014) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951714541861 · Cited by 839
Power through the algorithm? Participatory web cultures and the technological unconscious
Beer, D. (2009) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444809336551 · Cited by 773
Metadata
- Authors
- Savage, M., & Burrows, R.
- Venue
- Sociology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-10
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 885-899
- ISSN
- 0038-0385 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8684
- OpenAlex
- W2132874039
- Cited by
- 914
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 88.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Coming Crisis of Empirical Sociology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0038038507080443
- The paper
- Savage, M., & Burrows, R. (2007). The Coming Crisis of Empirical Sociology. Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038507080443
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
