A New Model of Social Class? Findings from the BBC’s Great British Class Survey Experiment
Open accessAbstract
The social scientific analysis of social class is attracting renewed interest given the accentuation of economic and social inequalities throughout the world. The most widely validated measure of social class, the Nuffield class schema, developed in the 1970s, was codified in the UK’s National Statistics Socio-Economic Classification (NS-SEC) and places people in one of seven main classes according to their occupation and employment status. This principally distinguishes between people working in routine or semi-routine occupations employed on a ‘labour contract’ on the one hand, and those working in professional or managerial occupations employed on a ‘service contract’ on the other. However, this occupationally based class schema does not effectively capture the role of social and cultural processes in generating class divisions. We analyse the largest survey of social class ever conducted in the UK, the BBC’s 2011 Great British Class Survey, with 161,400 web respondents, as well as a nationally representative sample survey, which includes unusually detailed questions asked on social, cultural and economic capital. Using latent class analysis on these variables, we derive seven classes. We demonstrate the existence of an ‘elite’, whose wealth separates them from an established middle class, as well as a class of technical experts and a class of ‘new affluent’ workers. We also show that at the lower levels of the class structure, alongside an ageing traditional working class, there is a ‘precariat’ characterised by very low levels of capital, and a group of emergent service workers. We think that this new seven class model recognises both social polarisation in British society and class fragmentation in its middle layers, and will attract enormous interest from a wide social scientific community in offering an up-to-date multi-dimensional model of social class.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Differences between the social classes identified by Savage et al. extended beyond financial circumstances to marked differences in social and cultural capital.
“the differences between the social classes they identified extended beyond differences in financial circumstances. There were also marked differences in social and cultural capital”
From The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour (2018) · cites this paper as Savage et al. (2013)
Savage et al. identified seven classes ranging from an elite with an average annual household income of £89,000 to a precariat with an average annual household income of £8,000.
“the authors identified seven classes, ranging from an ‘elite’, with an average annual household income of £89,000, to a ‘precariat’ with an average annual household income of £8,000”
From The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour (2018) · cites this paper as Savage et al. (2013)
The traditional working-class category formed only 14% of the population in Savage et al.'s study.
“the ‘traditional working‐class’ category formed only 14% of the population”
From The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour (2018) · cites this paper as Savage et al. (2013)
The class system in the United Kingdom is very much still in existence, albeit in a form that differs from the more traditional forms based primarily on occupation.
“the class system in the United Kingdom is very much still in existence, albeit in a way that differs from the more traditional forms that were based primarily on occupation”
From The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour (2018) · cites this paper as Savage et al. (2013)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour
Manstead, A. S. R. (2018) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12251 · Cited by 831 · see citing works
“In one of the more comprehensive recent studies, Savage et al. (2013) analysed the results of a large surveyof social class in theUnited Kingdom, the BBC’s 2011 Great British Class Survey, which involved 161,400 web respondents, along with the results of a nationally representative sample survey.”
ResultKapilashrami, A., Hill, S., & Meer, N. (2015) · Social Theory & Health · doi:10.1057/sth.2015.16 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
The Labor Market Value of Taste: An Experimental Study of Class Bias in U.S. Employment
Thomas, K. (2018) · Sociological Science · doi:10.15195/v5.a24 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Say my name? Anonymity or not in elite interviewing
Ellersgaard, C. H., Ditlevsen, K., & Larsen, A. G. (2022) · International Journal of Social Research Methodology · doi:10.1080/13645579.2021.1932717 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Bryan, B. T., Thompson, K. N., Goldman-Mellor, S., Moffitt, T. E., Odgers, C. L., So, S. L. S., Uddin Rahman, M., Wertz, J., Matthews, T., & Arseneault, L. (2024) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116697 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
- Authors
- Savage, M., Devine, F., Cunningham, N., Taylor, M., Li, Y., Hjellbrekke, J., Le Roux, B., Friedman, S., & Miles, A.
- Affiliations
- London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
- University of Manchester (GB)
- University of York (GB)
- Universitetet i Bergen, Norway
- Université Paris Descartes, France
- City, University of London (GB)
- Venue
- Sociology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-04
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 219-250
- ISSN
- 0038-0385 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8684
- OpenAlex
- W2141028849
- Cited by
- 1,303
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 48 · 2025: 115 · 2024: 93 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 125 · 2021: 114 · 2020: 94 · 2019: 105 · 2018: 120 · 2017: 146 · 2016: 79 · 2015: 91 · 2014: 73 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 277.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Sociology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
- London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion)
- City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
- London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- University of Manchester
- Economic and Social Research Council (ES/H010769/1, ES/K002198/1, ES/I035168/1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Cultural Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
- Keywords
- social class, latent class analysis, social capital, cultural capital, economic capital, occupational class, precariat, elite class, social polarization, class structure, British society
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review