Cited by 1,303Social and Cultural DynamicsIntergenerational and Educational Inequality StudiesIncome, Poverty, and Inequality

A New Model of Social Class? Findings from the BBC’s Great British Class Survey Experiment

Open access
Savage, Mike, Devine, Fiona, Cunningham, Niall, Taylor, Mark, Li, Yaojun, Hjellbrekke, Johs, Le Roux, Brigitte, Friedman, Sam +1 more·2013·Sociology

Abstract

The social scientific analysis of social class is attracting renewed interest given the accentuation of economic and social inequalities throughout the world. The most widely validated measure of social class, the Nuffield class schema, developed in the 1970s, was codified in the UK’s National Statistics Socio-Economic Classification (NS-SEC) and places people in one of seven main classes according to their occupation and employment status. This principally distinguishes between people working in routine or semi-routine occupations employed on a ‘labour contract’ on the one hand, and those working in professional or managerial occupations employed on a ‘service contract’ on the other. However, this occupationally based class schema does not effectively capture the role of social and cultural processes in generating class divisions. We analyse the largest survey of social class ever conducted in the UK, the BBC’s 2011 Great British Class Survey, with 161,400 web respondents, as well as a nationally representative sample survey, which includes unusually detailed questions asked on social, cultural and economic capital. Using latent class analysis on these variables, we derive seven classes. We demonstrate the existence of an ‘elite’, whose wealth separates them from an established middle class, as well as a class of technical experts and a class of ‘new affluent’ workers. We also show that at the lower levels of the class structure, alongside an ageing traditional working class, there is a ‘precariat’ characterised by very low levels of capital, and a group of emergent service workers. We think that this new seven class model recognises both social polarisation in British society and class fragmentation in its middle layers, and will attract enormous interest from a wide social scientific community in offering an up-to-date multi-dimensional model of social class.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0038038513481128

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Differences between the social classes identified by Savage et al. extended beyond financial circumstances to marked differences in social and cultural capital.

    “the differences between the social classes they identified extended beyond differences in financial circumstances. There were also marked differences in social and cultural capital”
  • Savage et al. identified seven classes ranging from an elite with an average annual household income of £89,000 to a precariat with an average annual household income of £8,000.

    “the authors identified seven classes, ranging from an ‘elite’, with an average annual household income of £89,000, to a ‘precariat’ with an average annual household income of £8,000”
  • The traditional working-class category formed only 14% of the population in Savage et al.'s study.

    “the ‘traditional working‐class’ category formed only 14% of the population”
  • The class system in the United Kingdom is very much still in existence, albeit in a form that differs from the more traditional forms based primarily on occupation.

    “the class system in the United Kingdom is very much still in existence, albeit in a way that differs from the more traditional forms that were based primarily on occupation”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Savage, M., Devine, F., Cunningham, N., Taylor, M., Li, Y., Hjellbrekke, J., Le Roux, B., Friedman, S., & Miles, A.
Affiliations
  • London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • University of York (GB)
  • Universitetet i Bergen, Norway
  • Université Paris Descartes, France
  • City, University of London (GB)
Venue
Sociology
Published
2013-04
Volume
47
Issue
2
Pages
219-250
ISSN
  • 0038-0385 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8684
OpenAlex
W2141028849
Cited by
1,303
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 48 · 2025: 115 · 2024: 93 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 125 · 2021: 114 · 2020: 94 · 2019: 105 · 2018: 120 · 2017: 146 · 2016: 79 · 2015: 91 · 2014: 73 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 2
FWCI
277.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sociology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion)
  • City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • University of Manchester
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/H010769/1, ES/K002198/1, ES/I035168/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Cultural Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
Keywords
social class, latent class analysis, social capital, cultural capital, economic capital, occupational class, precariat, elite class, social polarization, class structure, British society

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review