The DOI matches its Crossref record.
`Someone to Watch Over Me': Surveillance, Discipline and the Just-in-Time Labour Process
Abstract
Theory and observations are used to argue that JIT/TQC regimes both create and demand systems of surveillance which improve on those of previous factory regimes by instilling discipline and thereby enhancing central control. For its theoretical inspiration this paper draws upon the work of Michel Foucault, especially his conception of Power/Knowledge as articulated in his book Discipline and Punish. This theoretical framework is extended to provide a means of analysis of the mechanisms of surveillance and control that operate in the contemporary work place. While there is a sense in which tactical responsibility is delegated in an organisation practising JIT/TQM, strategic control is simultaneously centralised - a form of devolutionism. Drawing on the work of Foucault we will argue that the JIT/TQM approach is both enabled and enhanced by the operation of two complementary disciplinary forces. The first of these is the discipline which derives from the scrutiny of one's peers in a manufacturing cell, quality circle, etc. - a horizontal process which is supported by the organisational structure associated with JIT/TQM. The second and key disciplinary force is that which derives from the use of increasingly powerful management information systems which provide extensive shop floor surveillance - a vertical process which provides an over-arching controlling mechanism. We demonstrate that the surveillance systems integral to JIT/TQM are deliberately designed such that discipline is established in a most efficient manner and the exercise of minute control is possible with a minimum of supervisors. The desired effect of harnessing these dual forces is to minimise negative divergences from expected behaviour and management defined norms whilst identifying positive divergencies and maximising their creative potential.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Tightening the Iron Cage: Concertive Control in Self-Managing Teams
Barker, J. R. (1993) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393374 · Cited by 2,305
Career as a Project of the Self and Labour Process Discipline
Grey, C. (1994) · Sociology · doi:10.1177/0038038594028002007 · Cited by 583
de Treville, S., & Antonakis, J. (2006) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2005.04.001 · Cited by 549
Why Has Work Effort Become More Intense?
Green, F. (2004) · Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society · doi:10.1111/j.0019-8676.2004.00359.x · Cited by 408
Between autonomy and control: Strategies of arbitrage in the “on-demand” economy
Shapiro, A. (2018) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444817738236 · Cited by 374
Haslam, S. A., Eggins, R. A., & Reynolds, K. J. (2003) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/096317903321208907 · Cited by 362
Robots and organization studies: Why robots might not want to steal your job
Fleming, P. (2019) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840618765568 · Cited by 297
The Contexts of Control: Information, Power, and Truck-Driving Work
Levy, K. E. C. (2015) · The Information Society · doi:10.1080/01972243.2015.998105 · Cited by 171
Samuel, D., Found, P., & Williams, S. J. (2015) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-12-2013-0555 · Cited by 146
Doolin, B. (1998) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/jit.1998.8 · Cited by 125
Costas, J., & Grey, C. (2014) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840613502768 · Cited by 117
Lean production assessed by Karasek's job demand-job control model
Schouteten, R., & Benders, J. (2004) · Economic and Industrial Democracy · doi:10.1177/0143831x04044831 · Cited by 109
Ajunwa, I., & Greene, D. (2019) · Research in the Sociology of Work · doi:10.1108/s0277-283320190000033005 · Cited by 58
Charteris, J., Gregory, S., & Masters, Y. (2018) · Gender and Education · doi:10.1080/09540253.2016.1188198 · Cited by 48
An Ethical Perspective on Emerging Forms of Ubiquitous IT-Based Control
Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, A. (2017) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2708-z · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Sewell, G., & Wilkinson, B.
- Venue
- Sociology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1992-05
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 271-289
- ISSN
- 0038-0385 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8684
- OpenAlex
- W2142159299
- Cited by
- 766
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 80.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.