The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How Conflict Escalates: The Inter-Group Dynamics of Collective Football Crowd `Violence'
Abstract
In recent years, the debate on football crowd violence has concentrated on the violent dispositions of participants - and particularly on the nature and origins of conflictual norms held by `hooligan' fans. In this paper, we challenge this tendency. We argue that the `hooligan' perspective is limited in its ability to explain how conflict generalises during crowd events, the precise conditions under which it originates, and the form that it takes. In order to account for these phenomena it is necessary to broaden the scope of enquiry so as to include the police as well as fans. Using events involving England fans at the 1990 world cup (Italia 90), we propose a model in which the nature of group norms and group conflict are a consequence of the developing interactions between England supporters and the Italian Caribineri. The assumption, on the part of the police, that all fans were potentially dangerous and their treatment of fans as such led, over time, to a situation where fans who initially eschewed violence, came into conflict with the police. The example both illustrates the value of an analysis of collective football violence in terms of developmental inter-group dynamics and suggests how the assumption that fans are inherently dangerous may become a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reiner, R. (2010) · doi:10.1093/he/9780199283392.001.0001 · Cited by 1,886
Cited by
Collective Psychological Empowerment as a Model of Social Change: Researching Crowds and Power
Drury, J., & Reicher, S. (2009) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01622.x · Cited by 466
Self-citationThe role of social identity processes in mass emergency behaviour: An integrative review
Drury, J. (2018) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463283.2018.1471948 · Cited by 346
Opinion‐based group membership as a predictor of commitment to political action
Bliuc, A., McGarty, C., Reynolds, K., & Muntele, D. (2007) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.334 · Cited by 329
Stott, C., Hutchison, P., & Drury, J. (2001) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466601164876 · Cited by 255
Self-citation'Keeping the Peace': Social Identity, Procedural Justice and the Policing of Football Crowds
Stott, C., Hoggett, J., & Pearson, G. (2012) · British Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1093/bjc/azr076 · Cited by 132
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Stott, C., & Reicher, S.
- Venue
- Sociology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1998-05
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 353-377
- ISSN
- 0038-0385 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8684
- OpenAlex
- W2031905887
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How Conflict Escalates: The Inter-Group Dynamics of Collective Football Crowd `Violence'. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0038038598032002007
- The paper
- Stott, C., & Reicher, S. (1998). How Conflict Escalates: The Inter-Group Dynamics of Collective Football Crowd `Violence'. Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038598032002007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.