Data Based IEP Development: An Approach to Substantive Compliance
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CBMs and time series data on student progress are effective setting events for influencing teachers' decision making and practices and managing IEPs.
“CBMs and time series data on student progress are effective setting events for influencing teachers' decision making and practices as well managing Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) [7,8,10,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30].”
From Curriculum-Based Measurement: A Brief History of Nearly Everything from the 1970s to the Present (2013) · cites this paper as [8]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Curriculum-Based Measurement: A Brief History of Nearly Everything from the 1970s to the Present
Tindal, G. (2013) · ISRN Education · doi:10.1155/2013/958530 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
“This last component was deemed to be a critical component of formative evaluation [7, 8] and development of Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) [9] and assessment of short- and long-term goals [10].”
BackgroundVarying the Difficulty of Testing Materials: Implications for Curriculum-Based Measurement
Shinn, M. R., Gleason, M. M., & Tindal, G. (1989) · The Journal of Special Education · doi:10.1177/002246698902300208 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
- Authors
- Deno, S. L., & Mirkin, P. K.
- Venue
- TEACHING Exceptional Children
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1980-03
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 92-97
- ISSN
- 0040-0599 (ISSN-L)
- 2163-5684
- OpenAlex
- W1596161417
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 79.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Teaching Exceptional Children (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal Issues in Education
- Keywords
- individualized education program, data-driven decision making, special education law, IEP development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
