The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Seeing from the South: Refocusing Urban Planning on the Globe’s Central Urban Issues
Abstract
Urban planning in many parts of the world reflects an increasing gap between current approaches and growing problems of poverty, inequality, informality, rapid urbanisation and spatial fragmentation, particularly (but not only) in cities of the global South. Given past dominance of the global North in shaping planning theory and practice, this article argues that a perspective from the global South can be useful in unsettling taken-for-granted assumptions about how planning addresses these issues. The article takes a first step in this direction by proposing a ‘clash of rationalities’, between techno-managerial and marketised systems of government administration, service provision and planning (in those parts of the world where these apply) and increasingly marginalised urban populations surviving largely under conditions of informality. It draws together theoretical resources beyond the boundaries of conventional planning theory to understand the nature of this conflict, and the nature of the ‘interface’ between those involved, where unpredictable encounter and contestation also open the possibility for exploring alternative approaches to planning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Caldeira, T. P. (2017) · Environment and Planning D: Society and Space · doi:10.1177/0263775816658479 · Cited by 773
Thinking cities through elsewhere: Comparative tactics for a more global urban studies
Robinson, J. (2016) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1177/0309132515598025 · Cited by 659
Comparative Urbanism: New Geographies and Cultures of Theorizing the Urban
Robinson, J. (2016) · International Journal of Urban and Regional Research · doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12273 · Cited by 432
Urban imaginaries: funding mega infrastructure projects in Lagos, Nigeria
Adama, O. (2018) · GeoJournal · doi:10.1007/s10708-016-9761-8 · Cited by 73
Socio-spatial legibility, discipline, and gentrification through favela upgrading in Rio de Janeiro
Comelli, T., Anguelovski, I., & Chu, E. (2018) · City · doi:10.1080/13604813.2018.1549205 · Cited by 26
“As a result, cities in the global South became hamstrung by capacity and governance deficits symptomatic of the post-colonial condition (Watson 2009; Robinson 2011; Roy 2011a).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Watson, V.
- Venue
- Urban Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-09-15
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2259-2275
- ISSN
- 0042-0980 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-063X
- OpenAlex
- W2152768411
- Cited by
- 1,008
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 50.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Seeing from the South: Refocusing Urban Planning on the Globe’s Central Urban Issues. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0042098009342598
- The paper
- Watson, V. (2009). Seeing from the South: Refocusing Urban Planning on the Globe’s Central Urban Issues. Urban Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009342598
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.