The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploring the Theoretical Framework of Emotional Solidarity between Residents and Tourists
Abstract
Residents and tourists within destinations are often portrayed as being separate from each other, possessing little in common. Such an approach can undermine the potential for a dynamic, intimate relationship to exist between residents and tourists. This research offers the theory of emotional solidarity, put forth by Emile Durkheim, as a theoretical framework to examine the relationship between residents and tourists. In addition, a series of focus groups with residents of a coastal South Carolina county was conducted to ascertain residents’ feelings about tourists and commonalities with tourists (i.e., shared beliefs, shared behavior, and interaction). Themes corresponding to constructs from Durkheim’s model were generated from the qualitative data analysis. Findings are discussed, along with practical implications and future research options.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research
Robinson, P. (2007) · Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1111/j.1753-6405.2007.00096.x · Cited by 23,258
The Practice of Social Research
Neustadtl, A., & Babbie, E. (1989) · Teaching Sociology · doi:10.2307/1318433 · Cited by 14,398
Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods
Lotto, L. S., Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1986) · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis · doi:10.2307/1163741 · Cited by 10,315
Focus Groups as Qualitative Research
Morgan, D. (1997) · doi:10.4135/9781412984287 · Cited by 8,863
Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research
Billson, J. M. (1989) · Human Biology · Cited by 8,560
The Practice of Social Research.
Williams, D. G., & Babbie, E. R. (1976) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2062956 · Cited by 7,194
Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities.
Parker, E. B., & Holsti, O. R. (1970) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2093233 · Cited by 4,564
The Tourist: A New Theory of the Leisure Class.
Wedow, S., & MacCannell, D. (1977) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2065807 · Cited by 3,817
The Elementary Forms of Religious Life
Durkheim, E., & Swain, J. W. (1916) · The American Journal of Nursing · doi:10.2307/3405938 · Cited by 3,400
The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life: the Totemic System in Australia
(2011) · Durkheim on Religion · doi:10.2307/j.ctt1cgf6tc.14 · Cited by 3,310
Cited by
Wang, S., Berbekova, A., Uysal, M., & Wang, J. (2024) · Journal of Travel Research · doi:10.1177/00472875221146786 · Cited by 112
Yang, J., Zhang, D., Liu, X., Li, Z., & Liang, Y. (2022) · Tourism Management Perspectives · doi:10.1016/j.tmp.2022.100982 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Woosnam, K. M., Norman, W. C., & Ying, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Travel Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-02-27
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 245-258
- ISSN
- 0047-2875 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-6763
- OpenAlex
- W2099555692
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 53
- FWCI
- 20.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exploring the Theoretical Framework of Emotional Solidarity between Residents and Tourists. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0047287509332334
- The paper
- Woosnam, K. M., Norman, W. C., & Ying, T. (2009). Exploring the Theoretical Framework of Emotional Solidarity between Residents and Tourists. Journal of Travel Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287509332334
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
