Cited by 8,863Focus Groups and Qualitative MethodsQualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsQualitative Research Methods and Ethics

Focus Groups as Qualitative Research

Morgan, David·1997·Sage eBooks

Abstract

Introduction Focus Groups as Qualitative Method The Uses of Focus Groups Planning and Research Design for Focus Groups Conducting and Analyzing Focus Groups Additional Possibilities Conclusions

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4135/9781412984287

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Focus groups offer an advantage over other forms of qualitative data collection, especially when discussing new phenomena or concepts that are not yet publicly conceptualised in mainstream society.

    “Focus groups offer an advantage over other forms of qualitative data collection, especially when discussing new phenomena or concepts that are not yet publicly conceptualised in mainstream society (Morgan, 1997).”
  • Focus group interviews may reveal aspects of experiences and perspectives that would not be as accessible without group interaction.

    “Focus group interviews may “reveal aspects of experiences and perspectives that would be not as accessible without group interaction […] participants respond to each other: providing agreement and disagreement, asking questions and giving answers” (Morgan, 1997, p. 20).”

    From Artificial intelligence literacy in libraries (2023) · cites this paper as Morgan, 1997

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morgan, D.
Affiliations
Portland State University (US)
Corresponding author
Morgan, David
Venue
Sage eBooks
Published
1997
OpenAlex
W2045507107
Cited by
8,863
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 368 · 2025: 299 · 2024: 236 · 2023: 210 · 2022: 227 · 2021: 295 · 2020: 296 · 2019: 340 · 2018: 327 · 2017: 317 · 2016: 355 · 2015: 383 · 2014: 464 · 2013: 483 · 2012: 488
FWCI
284.83
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sage eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Acquire (CQUniversity) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Keywords
focus groups, qualitative research, research design, qualitative data analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review