The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Computational Grounded Theory: A Methodological Framework
Abstract
This article proposes a three-step methodological framework called computational grounded theory, which combines expert human knowledge and hermeneutic skills with the processing power and pattern recognition of computers, producing a more methodologically rigorous but interpretive approach to content analysis. The first, pattern detection step, involves inductive computational exploration of text, using techniques such as unsupervised machine learning and word scores to help researchers to see novel patterns in their data. The second, pattern refinement step, returns to an interpretive engagement with the data through qualitative deep reading or further exploration of the data. The third, pattern confirmation step, assesses the inductively identified patterns using further computational and natural language processing techniques. The result is an efficient, rigorous, and fully reproducible computational grounded theory. This framework can be applied to any qualitative text as data, including transcribed speeches, interviews, open-ended survey data, or ethnographic field notes, and can address many potential research questions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research.
Wagner, H. R., Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1968) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2575405 · Cited by 46,361
Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology.
Shelley, M., & Krippendorff, K. (1984) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288384 · Cited by 24,312
(2014) · Cited by 15,747
Introduction to Information Retrieval
Manning, C. D., Raghavan, P., & Schütze, H. (2008) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511809071 · Cited by 11,288
Hinton, G., Deng, L., Yu, D., Dahl, G., Mohamed, A.-R., Jaitly, N., Senior, A., Vanhoucke, V., Nguyen, P., Sainath, T., et al. (2012) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2012.2205597 · Cited by 10,260 · cited 2×
“2013; Monroe, Colaresi, and Quinn 2008), psychologists (Tausczik and Pennebaker 2010; Yu and Ho 2014), and linguists (P. F. Brown et al. 1993; Hinton et al. 2012), are using computer-assisted text analysis techniques to bolster, and in some cases completely replace, traditional content analysis methods in their discip…”
MethodTerm-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval
Salton, G., & Buckley, C. (1988) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/0306-4573(88)90021-0 · Cited by 9,740
The Content Analysis Guidebook
Neuendorf, K. A. (2017) · doi:10.4135/9781071802878 · Cited by 9,286 · cited 2×
“The researcher then typically trains research assistants to code text into these predetermined categories (see, e.g., Krippendorff 2013; Neuendorf 2001; Saldana 2015).”
BackgroundThe Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods
Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x09351676 · Cited by 5,774
Blei, D. M. (2012) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/2133806.2133826 · Cited by 5,516
The mathematics of statistical machine translation: parameter estimation
Brown, P. F., Pietra, V. J. D., Pietra, S. A. D., & Mercer, R. L. (1993) · Cited by 3,973
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Biernacki Richard, 1997, The Fabrication of Labor: Germany and Britain, 1640-1914
- Chicago Women’s Liberation Union (, 1972, Womankind, 2
- Dunning Ted, 1993, Computational Linguistics, 19, 61
- Evans John H., 2002, Playing God? Human Genetic Engineering and the Rationalization of Public Bioethical Debate
- Glaser Barney G., 2005, Awareness of Dying
- Hull-House, 1907, Hull-House Year Book: September 1, 1906- September 1,1907
- 10.1016/S0304-422X(99)00025-X · doi:10.1016/s0304-422x(99)00025-x
- Moretti Franco, 2013, Distant Reading
- Saldana Johnny, 2015, The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers
Cited by
Computational Social Science and Sociology
Edelmann, A., Wolff, T., Montagne, D., & Bail, C. A. (2020) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054621 · Cited by 305
Knowledge Discovery: Methods from data mining and machine learning
Shu, X., & Ye, Y. (2023) · Social Science Research · doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2022.102817 · Cited by 267
(2019) · doi:10.1145/3351095.3372862 · Cited by 167
Measuring algorithmically infused societies
Wagner, C., Strohmaier, M., Olteanu, A., Kıcıman, E., Contractor, N., & Eliassi-Rad, T. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03666-1 · Cited by 144
PaTAT: Human-AI Collaborative Qualitative Coding with Explainable Interactive Rule Synthesis
Gebreegziabher, S. A., Zhang, Z., Tang, X., Meng, Y., Glassman, E. L., & Li, T. J.-J. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3581352 · Cited by 72
Metadata
- Authors
- Nelson, L. K.
- Venue
- Sociological Methods & Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2017-11-21
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-42
- ISSN
- 0049-1241 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8294
- OpenAlex
- W2769563773
- Cited by
- 697
- References
- 58
- FWCI
- 88.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computational Grounded Theory: A Methodological Framework. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0049124117729703
- The paper
- Nelson, L. K. (2020). Computational Grounded Theory: A Methodological Framework. Sociological Methods & Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124117729703
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
