Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 171

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Comparing Regression Coefficients Across Subsamples: A Study of the Statistical Test

COHEN, AYALA·1983·Sociological Methods & Research

Abstract

The comparison of regression coefficients across subsamples is relevant to many studies. Often, the same regression model is fitted to several subsamples and the question arises whether the effect of some of the explanatory variables, as expressed by the linear model, is the same for all subsamples. Because there are sometimes misunderstandings as to the statistical procedure which ought to be applied and consequently, wrong formulae are sometimes adopted by researchers. The purpose of this article is to describe in detail the relevant statistical procedures, together with the assumptions underlying the statistical tests. Some examples are quoted, in which wrong formulae were applied. It is demonstrated how the adoption of the wrong formulae might lead to mistaken conclusions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0049124183012001003

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 171

Metadata

Authors
COHEN, A.
Venue
Sociological Methods & Research
Published
1983-08
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
77-94
ISSN
  • 0049-1241 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8294
OpenAlex
W2055778935
Cited by
171
References
0
FWCI
2.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparing Regression Coefficients Across Subsamples: A Study of the Statistical Test. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0049124183012001003
The paper
COHEN, A. (1983). Comparing Regression Coefficients Across Subsamples: A Study of the Statistical Test. Sociological Methods & Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124183012001003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.