Cited by 209Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

Enhanced brain connectivity in long-term meditation practitioners

Open access
Luders, Eileen, Clark, Kristi, Narr, Katherine L., Toga, Arthur W.·2011·NeuroImage

Abstract

Very little is currently known about the cerebral characteristics that underlie the complex processes of meditation as only a limited number of studies have addressed this topic. Research exploring structural connectivity in meditation practitioners is particularly rare. We thus acquired diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) data of high angular and spatial resolution and used atlas-based tract mapping methods to investigate white matter fiber characteristics in a well-matched sample of long-term meditators and controls (n=54). A broad field mapping approach estimated the fractional anisotropy (FA) for twenty different fiber tracts (i.e., nine tracts in each hemisphere and two inter-hemispheric tracts) that were subsequently used as dependent measures. Results showed pronounced structural connectivity in meditators compared to controls throughout the entire brain within major projection pathways, commissural pathways, and association pathways. The largest group differences were observed within the corticospinal tract, the temporal component of the superior longitudinal fasciculus, and the uncinate fasciculus. While cross-sectional studies represent a good starting point for elucidating possible links between meditation and white matter fiber characteristics, longitudinal studies will be necessary to determine the relative contribution of nature and nurture to enhanced structural connectivity in long-term meditators.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.075

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Experienced mindfulness meditators showed increased FA compared to meditation-naïve controls.

    “Furthermore, in the longer term, experienced mindfulness meditators showed increased FA compared to meditation-naïve controls (Kang et al., 2013; Luders et al., 2011; Laneri et al., 2015).”

    From Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and white matter plasticity in individuals with subclinical depression and psychotic experiences: A Randomised Controlled Trial (2023) · cites this paper as Luders et al., 2011

    The Results (FA Differences between Long-term Meditators and Controls; page not specified) report significantly larger FA in several tracts in meditators than in controls. The Subjects section describes several meditation styles and age- and sex-matched controls, but does not establish that all practitioners practiced mindfulness or that the controls were meditation-naïve. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Long-term meditation practice can trigger meditation-specific neuroplastic changes in brain regions underlying cognitive control and affective regulation.

    “long-term meditation practice can trigger meditation-specific neuroplastic changes in the brain regions underlying cognitive control and affective regulation”

    From Potential therapeutic effects of meditation for treating affective dysregulation (2014) · cites this paper as [58]

    The Results report greater white-matter connectivity in long-term meditators, and the Discussion (Correspondence with Previous Findings) links one affected tract to regions implicated in emotional regulation. The Discussion (Nature versus Nurture) says these differences may be effects of meditation, but its cross-sectional design cannot rule out pre-existing differences. It therefore does not establish that the observed changes were triggered specifically by long-term meditation practice. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A substantial body of research has evidenced that mindfulness and compassion meditation can have a positive impact on attention and affective regulation and can induce long-lasting morphological changes in the prefrontal cortices and amygdala.

    “A substantial body of research has evidenced that mindfulness and compassion meditation can have a positive impact on attention and affective regulation [54, 55] and can induce long-lasting morphological changes in the corresponding neural regions—specifically, the prefrontal cortices and amygdala [56–58].”

    From Potential therapeutic effects of meditation for treating affective dysregulation (2014) · cites this paper as [58]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Luders, E., Clark, K., Narr, K. L., & Toga, A. W.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-08
Volume
57
Issue
4
Pages
1308-1316
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2023032892
Cited by
209
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 12
FWCI
12.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Brain Mapping Medical Research Organization
  • Robson Family
  • Northstar Fund
  • Brain Mapping Support
  • Pierson-Lovelace
  • Ahmanson
  • Tamkin
  • William M. & Linda R. Dietel Philanthropic Fund at the Northern Piedmont Community
  • Jennifer Jones-Simon
  • Capital Group Companies
  • National Institutes of Health (U54 RR021813, P41 RR013642, M01 RR000865)
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR12169, RR13642, RR00865)
  • Human Brain Project (P20-MHDA52176, 5P01-EB001955)
  • Biomedical Imaging & Bioengineering
  • Mental Health
  • Drug Abuse
  • Cancer
  • Neurologic Disease & Stroke
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
meditation, long-term meditators, structural brain connectivity, white matter, fractional anisotropy, corticospinal tract, superior longitudinal fasciculus, uncinate fasciculus, commissural pathways, diffusion tensor imaging, tractography
MeSH terms
Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Male, Middle Aged, Neural Pathways, Anisotropy, Meditation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review