The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Statistical Models for Social Support Networks
Abstract
In recent years, the conceptualization of social support in the literature has become increasingly sophisticated, facilitating the consideration of more complex theories. Researchers no longer consider the mere availability of social ties, but look instead at the flow of specific resources through a social network. This article discusses how the social network has been defined in the context of social support. Research is reviewed, indicating how characteristics of individual tie (e.g., tie strength, proximity, frequency of contact, similarity) are related to the provision of support. Also examined are how characteristics of the personal network (e.g., size, density) relate to support and wellbeing. Statistical models for network analysis and how they should prove useful in studying social support are then discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815478 · Cited by 17,557
Self-citationBERKMAN, L. F., & SYME, S. L. (1979) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112674 · Cited by 5,341
THE CONTRIBUTION OF THE SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT TO HOST RESISTANCE1
CASSEL, J. (1976) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112281 · Cited by 1,816
Marsden, P. V., & Campbell, K. E. (1984) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/63.2.482 · Cited by 1,731
Cited by
Word of mouth communication within online communities: conceptualizing the online social network
Brown, J., Broderick, A. J., & Lee, N. (2007) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1002/dir.20082 · Cited by 1,661
Social networks and Internet connectivity effects
Haythornthwaite, C. (2005) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/13691180500146185 · Cited by 1,315
Strong, Weak, and Latent Ties and the Impact of New Media
Haythornthwaite, C. (2002) · The Information Society · doi:10.1080/01972240290108195 · Cited by 747
Sykes, T. A., Venkatesh, V., & Gosain, S. (2009) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/20650296 · Cited by 522
Shor, E., Roelfs, D. J., & Yogev, T. (2013) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2013.08.004 · Cited by 293
Metadata
- Authors
- WALKER, M. E., WASSERMAN, S., & WELLMAN, B.
- Venue
- Sociological Methods & Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1993-08
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 71-98
- ISSN
- 0049-1241 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8294
- OpenAlex
- W2021353502
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 11.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Statistical Models for Social Support Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0049124193022001004
- The paper
- WALKER, M. E., WASSERMAN, S., & WELLMAN, B. (1993). Statistical Models for Social Support Networks. Sociological Methods & Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124193022001004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.