Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 327

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Science in the Pub: Artisan Botanists in Early Nineteenth-Century Lancashire

Secord, Anne·1994·History of Science
DOI 10.1177/007327539403200302
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

En prenant comme modele d'etude l'artisan botaniste qui reflete la science populaire, l'A. concretise la relation existant entre la culture litteraire et l'experience pratique, et s'inspire de la theorie de l'habitus de Bourdieu (P.)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/007327539403200302

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Cited by

See all 327

Metadata

Authors
Secord, A.
Venue
History of Science
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
1994-09
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
269-315
ISSN
  • 0073-2753 (ISSN-L)
  • 1753-8564
DOI
10.1177/007327539403200302
OpenAlex
W1656099712
Cited by
327
References
21
FWCI
12.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Science in the Pub: Artisan Botanists in Early Nineteenth-Century Lancashire. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/007327539403200302
The paper
Secord, A. (1994). Science in the Pub: Artisan Botanists in Early Nineteenth-Century Lancashire. History of Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/007327539403200302

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.