The DOI matches its Crossref record.
People's History and Socialist Theory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Genre, Intertextuality, and Social Power
Briggs, C. L., & Bauman, R. (1992) · Journal of Linguistic Anthropology · doi:10.1525/jlin.1992.2.2.131 · Cited by 1,167
Television: Polysemy and popularity
Fiske, J. (1986) · Critical Studies in Mass Communication · doi:10.1080/15295038609366672 · Cited by 362
Accounts of health and illness: Dilemmas and representations
Radley, A., & Billig, M. (1996) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/1467-9566.ep10934984 · Cited by 330
Science in the Pub: Artisan Botanists in Early Nineteenth-Century Lancashire
Secord, A. (1994) · History of Science · doi:10.1177/007327539403200302 · Cited by 327
Black Bloggers and Their Varied Publics: The Everyday Politics of Black Discourse Online
Steele, C. K. (2018) · Television & New Media · doi:10.1177/1527476417709535 · Cited by 120
Metadata
- Authors
- Pollard, S., & Samuel, R.
- Venue
- The Economic History Review
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1981-08
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 493
- ISSN
- 0013-0117 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2568858771
- Cited by
- 464
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: People's History and Socialist Theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2595903
- The paper
- Pollard, S., & Samuel, R. (1981). People's History and Socialist Theory. The Economic History Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/2595903
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
