Cited by 33Mental Health Treatment and AccessPsychology and Mental HealthGender Roles and Identity Studies

University Students' Beliefs about the Causes and Treatments of Mental Illness

Samouilhan, Tanya, Seabi, Joseph·2010·South African Journal of Psychology

Abstract

Limited or incorrect mental health knowledge has been shown to result in negative attitudes toward mental illness and the seeking of psychological treatment. We endeavoured to investigate university students' beliefs about the etiology and treatment of mental illness. The sample comprised 112 students from the faculties of Law and Engineering of a large South African university. A three-part questionnaire was administered, which consisted of a section on demographic information, a vignette scale measuring the students' choice(s) of etiological factors and treatments for four types of mental illness, and Fischer and Farina's Attitudes Toward Seeking Professional Psychological Help Scale — Shortened Form ATSPPH-SF. The results indicated that the participants viewed stressful events as leading to both depression and substance abuse, chemical imbalance as a cause of schizophrenia, and negative social factors as causing anorexia nervosa. The overall top-rated treatment across the four disorders was professional psychological intervention as chosen by 48% of the participants. The results also indicated a number of significant relationships between etiological and treatment beliefs. The findings are discussed in the context of the literature, and recommendations for future research are made.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/008124631004000108

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Aetiological beliefs impact help-seeking styles, where beliefs that a mental disorder is caused by biology result in individuals seeking medical help, whereas stress-related causes are approached through social support.

    “Samouilhan and Seabi (2010) found that aetiological beliefs impact help-seeking styles, where beliefs that a mental disorder is caused by biology result in individuals seeking medical help, whereas stress-related causes are approached through social support.”

    From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Samouilhan and Seabi 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Samouilhan, T., & Seabi, J.
Affiliations
University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
Corresponding author
Samouilhan, Tanya
Venue
South African Journal of Psychology
Published
2010-03
Volume
40
Issue
1
Pages
74-89
ISSN
0081-2463 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2117849665
Cited by
33
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
South African Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion, public-domain)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
Keywords
mental illness beliefs, etiology of mental disorders, treatment beliefs, university students, depression, substance abuse, schizophrenia, anorexia nervosa, chemical imbalance, social factors, mental health knowledge

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review