Examining the Complexity of the Campus Racial Climate at a Hispanic Serving Community College
Abstract
Objective: Despite the growing representation of Hispanic Serving Institutions (HSIs) among community colleges, relatively little is known about student perceptions of the campus climate at these institutions. Although perceptions of campus climate may differ by race and adversely affect students of color, most research has been conducted at predominantly White institutions and through the use of either qualitative or quantitative methods. The present study examines student perceptions of discrimination and bias among Asian, Latina/o, and White students at a community college that has an HSI designation. Method: Employing a parallel mixed-method design, data were collected through the Diverse Learning Environments survey and focus groups at a community college in the western United States. An ANOVA with post hoc tests and a qualitative cross-case analysis were used to assess perceptions of discrimination and bias across racial groups. Results: Student perceptions differed by race with qualitative and quantitative results complementing and contradicting each other. Asian students reported more discrimination and bias on the survey but only shared positive perspectives in a focus group. By contrast, Latina/o students reported less discrimination and bias on the survey but in a focus group shared both positive and negative perceptions of the campus climate. Conclusion: The findings thus suggest that assessing perceptions of the campus climate at racially heterogeneous community…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
HSI community colleges also provide access to educational opportunities to other non-native English-speaking communities.
“HSI community colleges also provide access to educational opportunities to other non-native English-speaking communities (Contreras & Contreras, 2015;Cuellar & Johnson-Ahorlu, 2016).”
From Hispanic-Serving Institutions, Community Colleges, and Artificial Intelligence Chatbots: A Systematic Review and Interaction with HSI Community College Websites (2025) · cites this paper as Cuellar & Johnson-Ahorlu, 2016
Cites
Nine themes in campus racial climates and implications for institutional transformation
Harper, S. R., & Hurtado, S. (2007) · New Directions for Student Services · doi:10.1002/ss.254 · Cited by 813 · see citing works
Rankin, S. R., & Reason, R. D. (2005) · Journal of College Student Development · doi:10.1353/csd.2005.0008 · Cited by 550 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hernández, S. H., Taylor, Z. W., & Ortega, G. (2025) · Community College Review · doi:10.1177/00915521251338822 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cuellar, M., & Johnson-Ahorlu, R. N.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Davis (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cuellar, Marcela
- ORCID
- Cuellar, Marcela
- Venue
- Community College Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-02-23
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 135-152
- ISSN
- 0091-5521 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-2325
- OpenAlex
- W2285157988
- Cited by
- 83
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 22.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Community College Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Keywords
- campus racial climate, Hispanic-serving institutions, community colleges, racial bias, Asian students, Latina/o students, white students, focus groups, racial heterogeneity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review