The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploring the Digital Divide: Internet Connectedness and Age
Abstract
The existence of a digital divide between old and young Americans has been well documented. It is usually defined as access or lack of access to the Internet. This study adds context to the understanding of the digital divide by demonstrating differenes in Internet connectedness, a multidimensional concept that includes consideration of the scope and intensity of the relationship that people develop with the Internet. Age is shown to be significantly associated not just with access, but with a tendency to pursue a more narrow range of personal goals online and with a pattern of connecting to the Internet from a smaller range of places. Nonetheless, older respondents evaluate the Internet to be as central to their lives as younger people do. Some support is offered for the idea that the digital divide is not merely a generational effect.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: concurrent and discriminant validity evidence
Russell, D., Peplau, L. A., & Cutrona, C. E. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.3.472 · Cited by 5,173
THE ORIGINS OF INDIVIDUAL MEDIA-SYSTEM DEPENDENCY: A Sociological Framework
BALL-ROKEACH, S. J. (1985) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365085012004003 · Cited by 493
Storytelling Neighborhood: Paths to Belonging in Diverse Urban Environments
BALL-ROKEACH, S. J., KIM, Y.-C., & MATEI, S. (2001) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365001028004003 · Cited by 383
Silver surfers: Training and evaluating internet use among older adult learners
Cody, M. J., Dunn, D., Hoppin, S., & Wendt, P. (1999) · Communication Education · doi:10.1080/03634529909379178 · Cited by 269
White, H., McConnell, E., Clipp, E., Bynum, L., Teague, C., Navas, L., Craven, S., & Halbrecht, H. (1999) · Journal of Applied Gerontology · doi:10.1177/073346489901800306 · Cited by 261
Being Alone Versus Being with People: Disengagement in the Daily Experience of Older Adults.
Larson, R., Zuzanek, J., & Mannell, R. (1985) · Journal of Gerontology · doi:10.1093/geronj/40.3.375 · Cited by 148
Cited by
Second-Level Digital Divide: Differences in People's Online Skills
Hargittai, E. (2002) · First Monday · doi:10.5210/fm.v7i4.942 · Cited by 1,951
“…of differential Internet access and use document inequalities among various segments of the population (Bucy 2000) with particular attention to education (NTIA 2000) race (Hoffman 1999), gender (Bimber 2000), age (Loges and Jung 2001), income (Benton 1998) and rural residence (Strover 1999).”
Digital Na(t)ives? Variation in Internet Skills and Uses among Members of the “Net Generation”
Hargittai, E. (2010) · Sociological Inquiry · doi:10.1111/j.1475-682x.2009.00317.x · Cited by 1,564
Reconsidering Political and Popular Understandings of the Digital Divide
Selwyn, N. (2004) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444804042519 · Cited by 1,437
Digital Inequality: Differences in Young Adults' Use of the Internet
Hargittai, E., & Hinnant, A. (2008) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650208321782 · Cited by 1,251
The digital divide has grown old: Determinants of a digital divide among seniors
Friemel, T. N. (2016) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444814538648 · Cited by 1,136
Metadata
- Authors
- LOGES, W. E., & JUNG, J.-Y.
- Venue
- Communication Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-08
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 536-562
- ISSN
- 0093-6502 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3810
- OpenAlex
- W2013980900
- Cited by
- 414
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 20.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
