The DOI matches its Crossref record; 81 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Self-Presentation in Online Personals: The Role of Anticipated Future Interaction, Self-Disclosure, and Perceived Success in Internet Dating
Abstract
This study investigates self-disclosure in the novel context of online dating relationships. Using a national random sample of Match.com members ( N = 349), the authors tested a model of relational goals, self-disclosure, and perceived success in online dating. The authors’ findings provide support for social penetration theory and the social information processing and hyperpersonal perspectives as well as highlight the positive effect of anticipated future face-to-face interaction on online self-disclosure. The authors find that perceived online dating success is predicted by four dimensions of self-disclosure (honesty, amount, intent, and valence), although honesty has a negative effect. Furthermore, online dating experience is a strong predictor of perceived success in online dating. Additionally, the authors identify predictors of strategic success versus self-presentation success. This research extends existing theory on computer-mediated communication, self-disclosure, and relational success to the increasingly important arena of mixed-mode relationships, in which participants move from mediated to face-to-face communication.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Users have the benefits of both asynchronous and real-time communication (Gibbs et al., 2006).”
From Mobile Sexuality: Presentations of Young Filipinos in Dating Apps (2020) · cites this paper as Gibbs et al., 2006
In the citing paper
“The minimal cues that were present in the platform created adaptable users (Gibbs et al., 2006; Ramirez et al., 2015).”
From Mobile Sexuality: Presentations of Young Filipinos in Dating Apps (2020) · cites this paper as Gibbs et al., 2006
In the citing paper
“Some also mystified their selves by enhancing some qualities and deemphasizing the ones they felt were negative traits (Ellison et al., 2006; Gibbs et al., 2006; Toma et al., 2008; Toma & Carlson, 2012).”
From Mobile Sexuality: Presentations of Young Filipinos in Dating Apps (2020) · cites this paper as Gibbs et al., 2006
In the citing paper
“I expected such a scenario as previous findings revealed that individuals who misrepresented themselves online would not reveal their deceptive ways that easily (DePaulo, Kashy, Kirkendol, Wyer, & Epstein, 1996, as cited in Toma, Hancock, & Ellison, 2008; Gibbs et al., 2006).”
From Mobile Sexuality: Presentations of Young Filipinos in Dating Apps (2020) · cites this paper as Gibbs et al., 2006
In the citing paper
“I agree with the warnings that were written by scholars who advised users about the threats that the openness that online dating entails (Fiore, 2008; Gibbs et al., 2006) as this causes improper, unethical, and illegal online acts such as bullying, stalking, and identity theft.”
From Mobile Sexuality: Presentations of Young Filipinos in Dating Apps (2020) · cites this paper as Gibbs et al., 2006
In the citing paper
“Thirdly, many studies claim that users of UGM create their own content for selfexpression (e.g. [48] ) [49] [50]).”
From Watch, Share or Create: The Influence of Personality Traits and User Motivation on TikTok Mobile Video Usage (2020) · cites this paper as [48]
In the citing paper
“Indeed, this study reinforces the framework of offline modalities (e.g., Ellison et al., 2006; 2011; Gibbs et al., 2006).”
From When guests trust hosts for their words: Host description and trust in sharing economy (2018) · cites this paper as Gibbs et al., 2006
In the citing paper
“the identification of these two patterns implies opportunities to assess if one is more effective in bringing about consumer trust than the other.”
From When guests trust hosts for their words: Host description and trust in sharing economy (2018) · cites this paper as Gibbs et al., 2006
Citations
Cites
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1983) · Cited by 79,882
The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life.
Naegele, K. D., & Goffman, E. (1956) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2089106 · Cited by 26,049
Mail and internet surveys : the tailored design method
Dillman, D. A. (2007) · Cited by 9,587
Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet
Turkle, S. (1997) · Cited by 6,340
Social psychology: handbook of basic principles
Higgins, E., & Kruglanski, A. (2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-3496 · Cited by 5,535
Social psychology: handbook of basic principles
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-3595 · Cited by 4,970
Computer-Mediated Communication: Impersonal, Interpersonal, and Hyperpersonal Interaction
WALTHER, J. B. (1996) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365096023001001 · Cited by 4,798 · cited 7×
“This explanation fits with the view of the Internet as a medium for identity manipulation (e.g., Myers, 1987) or at least selective self-presentation ( Walther, 1996 ).”
BackgroundInfluentialPresentation of Self in Everyday Life, the
&, L. L. K., & Holtz‐Bacha, C. (2008) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781412953993.n530 · Cited by 3,796
The social psychology of telecommunications
Gray, G. (1977) · Telecommunications Policy · doi:10.1016/0308-5961(77)90016-7 · Cited by 3,486
Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method
Chisnall, P. M. (2007) · Journal of Advertising Research · doi:10.2501/s0021849907070237 · Cited by 3,463
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Bose, J., Proceedings of Statistics Canada Symposium 2001
- Brym, R.J., 2001, Love online: A report on digital dating in Canada
- Calabrese, R. J. (1975). The effects of privacy and probability of future interaction on initial interaction patterns . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
- Heino, R. D., International Communication Association convention
- Lea, M., 1995, Understudied relationships: Off the beaten track, 197
- Levinger, G., 1967, Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 13, 237
- Miller, H., Embodied Knowledge and Virtual Space conference, Goldsmiths’ College
- Ramirez, A., Communication Monographs
- St. John, W., 2002, The New York Times
- Taylor, D., 1987, Interpersonal processes: New directions in communication research, 257
- Tuten, T. L., 2002, Online social sciences, 7
- Utz, S., 2000, Journal of Online Behavior, 1
- Walther, J. B., Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 220
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 701
Sherblom, J. C. (2010) · Communication Education · doi:10.1080/03634523.2010.486440 · Cited by 78
Together is Better: Higher Committed Relationships Increase Life Satisfaction and Reduce Loneliness
Bucher, A., Neubauer, A., Voß, A., & Oetzbach, C. (2018) · Journal of Happiness Studies · doi:10.1007/s10902-018-0057-1 · Cited by 76
Porter, J. R., Sobel, K., Fox, S., Bennett, C. L., & Kientz, J. A. (2017) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3134722 · Cited by 81
Hu, C., Li, Z., & Huang, J. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.027 · Cited by 92
Evolutionary cyber-psychology: Applying an evolutionary framework to Internet behavior
Piazza, J. R., & Bering, J. M. (2009) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.07.002 · Cited by 74
Zhang, R., & Fu, J. S. (2020) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1093/jcmc/zmaa004 · Cited by 75
Choi, S., Williams, D. C., & Kim, H. (2020) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444820977199 · Cited by 80
Dressed for Sex: Red as a Female Sexual Signal in Humans
Elliot, A. J., & Pazda, A. D. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0034607 · Cited by 67
Putting Social Context into Text: The Semiotics of E‐mail Interaction
Menchik, D. A., & Tian, X. (2008) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/590650 · Cited by 66
WALTHER, C. T. C. J. B. (2010) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203876527-7 · Cited by 66
Be Social! The Impact of Self-Presentation on Peer-to-Peer Accommodation Revenue
Nieto‐García, M., Gallego, P. A. M., Viglia, G., & González‐Benito, Ó. (2019) · Journal of Travel Research · doi:10.1177/0047287519878520 · Cited by 67
Zhang, W., & Ram, S. (2020) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2020/15106 · Cited by 69
Stuart, J., & Scott, R. A. (2020) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106534 · Cited by 64
Predictors of job seekers’ self-disclosure on social media
Ouirdi, M. E., Segers, J., Ouirdi, A. E., & Pais, I. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.039 · Cited by 65
Jang, W., Bucy, E. P., & Cho, J. M. (2018) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.03.044 · Cited by 72
Personality variables as predictors of Facebook usage
Caci, B., Cardaci, M., Tabacchi, M. E., & Scrima, F. (2014) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/21.09.pr0.114k23w6 · Cited by 62
Ang, C., Talib, M. A., Tan, K., Tan, J., & Yaacob, S. N. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.037 · Cited by 72
Biswas, B. N., Sengupta, P., & Chatterjee, D. (2020) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2020.113324 · Cited by 61
Zheng, L., Huang, B., Qiu, H., & Bai, H. (2023) · International Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/02650487.2023.2229148 · Cited by 67
Stress caused by social media network applications and user responses
Lim, M., & Choi, S. B. (2015) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-015-2891-z · Cited by 61
Computer-Mediated Consent to Sex
Zytko, D., Furlo, N., Carlin, B., & Archer, M. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3449288 · Cited by 59
Impression Management Struggles in Online Dating
Zytko, D., Grandhi, S. A., & Jones, Q. (2014) · International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP) · doi:10.1145/2660398.2660410 · Cited by 59
Just say ‘‘no thanks’’: Romantic rejection in computer-mediated communication
Tong, S. T., & Walther, J. B. (2010) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/0265407510384895 · Cited by 58
Anandarajan, M., Zaman, M., Dai, Q., & Arinze, B. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication · doi:10.1109/tpc.2010.2046082 · Cited by 58
Law, Privacy, and Online Dating: “Revenge Porn” in Gay Online Communities
Waldman, A. E. (2019) · Law & Social Inquiry · doi:10.1017/lsi.2018.29 · Cited by 61
Kim, M., Kwon, K., & Lee, M.-R. (2009) · CyberPsychology & Behavior · doi:10.1089/cpb.2008.0296 · Cited by 57
An Empirical Study of Self-Disclosure in Spoken Dialogue Systems
Ravichander, A., & Black, A. W. (2018) · Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue · doi:10.18653/v1/w18-5030 · Cited by 62
Robot Reciprocation of Hugs Increases Both Interacting Times and Self-disclosures
Shiomi, M., Nakata, A., Kanbara, M., & Hagita, N. (2020) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-020-00644-x · Cited by 56
Contradictory deceptive behavior in online dating
Lo, S. K., Hsieh, A., & Chiu, Y. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.010 · Cited by 56
Strategic Self-presentation in the Sharing Economy: Implications for Host Branding
Tussyadiah, I. P. (2016) · Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28231-2_50 · Cited by 63
Reporting with WhatsApp: Mobile Chat Applications’ Impact on Journalistic Practices
Dodds, T. (2019) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2019.1592693 · Cited by 56
Antheunis, M. L., Schouten, A. P., & Walther, J. B. (2019) · Media Psychology · doi:10.1080/15213269.2019.1648217 · Cited by 69
Ghosted?: Navigating strategies for reducing uncertainty and implications surrounding ambiguous loss
LeFebvre, L. E., & Fan, X. (2020) · Personal Relationships · doi:10.1111/pere.12322 · Cited by 55
Marett, K., McNab, A. L., & Harris, R. B. (2011) · AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.17705/1thci.00032 · Cited by 54
Late adolescent identity definition and intimate disclosure on Facebook
Conde, Z. J., Mennecke, B. E., & Townsend, A. M. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.015 · Cited by 58
Feminist HCI meets facebook: Performativity and social networking sites
House, N. A. V. (2011) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2011.03.003 · Cited by 55
Kuo, F., Tseng, C.-Y., Tseng, F.-C., & Lin, C. S. (2013) · Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2012.0345 · Cited by 53
DeAndrea, D. C., Tong, S. T., Liang, Y. J., Levine, T. R., & Walther, J. B. (2012) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01646.x · Cited by 53
Cross-cultural comparison of Korean and American social network sites
Cho, S. E. (2010) · Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) · doi:10.7282/t3833s6z · Cited by 52
Lever, J., Grov, C., Royce, T., & Gillespie, B. J. (2008) · International Journal of Sexual Health · doi:10.1080/19317610802411532 · Cited by 51
Wotipka, C. D., & High, A. C. (2016) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637751.2016.1198041 · Cited by 51
Manbragging online: Self-praise on pick-up artists’ forums
Rüdiger, S., & Dayter, D. (2020) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2020.02.012 · Cited by 51
Self‐presentation and the value of information in Q&A websites
Raban, D. R. (2009) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.21188 · Cited by 51
Gu, R., Oh, L., & Wang, K. (2016) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2016.02.009 · Cited by 51
Deception in online dating: Significance and implications for the first offline date
Sharabi, L. L., & Caughlin, J. P. (2018) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444818792425 · Cited by 64
Zuo, Y., Ma, Y., Zhang, M., Wu, X., & Ren, Z. (2021) · Globalization and Health · doi:10.1186/s12992-021-00661-z · Cited by 53
Exploring self-presence in collaborative virtual teams
Ratan, R., & Hasler, B. S. (2010) · Cited by 50
Tong, S. T., Corriero, E. F., Wibowo, K. A., Makki, T. W., & Slatcher, R. B. (2019) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444819872678 · Cited by 56
When online meets offline: A field investigation of modality switching
McEwan, B. L., & Zanolla, D. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.020 · Cited by 48
‘Usually not one to complain but…’: constructing identities in user-generated online reviews
Vásquez, C. (2014) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9781137029317_4 · Cited by 47
Romantic relationship satisfaction and phubbing: The role of loneliness and empathy
Zhan, S., Shrestha, S., & Zhong, N. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.967339 · Cited by 45
Talking It Personally: Features of Successful Political Posts on Facebook
Nave, N. N., Shifman, L., & Tenenboim‐Weinblatt, K. (2018) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305118784771 · Cited by 52
Sarkar, S. (2015) · Transnational Social Review · doi:10.1080/21931674.2014.991184 · Cited by 44
Mun, I. B., & Kim, H. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.660484 · Cited by 50
Warner, M., Maestre, J. F., Gibbs, J., Chung, C.-F., & BLANDFORD, A. E. (2019) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300922 · Cited by 44
Self-citationLonely hearts and angry minds: Online dating rejection increases male (but not female) hostility
Andrighetto, L., Riva, P., & Gabbiadini, A. (2019) · Aggressive Behavior · doi:10.1002/ab.21852 · Cited by 45
Boyle, A. M., & O’Sullivan, L. F. (2016) · Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2015.0293 · Cited by 43
The filtered encounter: online dating and the problem of filtering through excessive information
Best, K., & Delmege, S. (2012) · Social Semiotics · doi:10.1080/10350330.2011.648405 · Cited by 42
Gender Differences in Motivations for Identity Reconstruction on Social Network Sites
Huang, J., Kumar, S., & Hu, C. (2017) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2017.1383061 · Cited by 48
Sultan, A. J. (2021) · Young Consumers Insight and Ideas for Responsible Marketers · doi:10.1108/yc-10-2020-1233 · Cited by 53
Xu, S., & Li, W. (2022) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448221108112 · Cited by 54
Ramirez, A., Zhang, S., McGrew, C., & Lin, S. (2007) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637750701716586 · Cited by 40
Ko, H. (2012) · Electronic Commerce Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2012.11.002 · Cited by 39
The Dialectical Nature of Impression Management in Knowledge Work
Erhardt, N., & Gibbs, J. L. (2014) · Management Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0893318913520508 · Cited by 44
Self-citationEffects of branded e-stickers on purchase intentions: The perspective of social capital theory
Lee, Y.-C. (2016) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2016.06.005 · Cited by 39
Pang, H. (2018) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00967 · Cited by 38
Lemke, R., & Weber, M. (2016) · Journal of Homosexuality · doi:10.1080/00918369.2016.1249735 · Cited by 38
Cross‐Cultural Differences in Applicant Faking on Personality Tests: A 43‐Nation Study
Fell, C. B., & König, C. J. (2016) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/apps.12078 · Cited by 41
The relational reconnection function of social network sites
Ramirez, A., Sumner, E. M., & Spinda, J. S. W. (2015) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444815614199 · Cited by 37
Miller, B. J., Mundey, P., & Hill, J. P. (2013) · Sociology of Religion · doi:10.1093/socrel/srs073 · Cited by 38
Social media use and adolescents’ well-being: A note on flourishing
Marciano, L., & Viswanath, K. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1092109 · Cited by 60
Baruh, L., & Cemalcılar, Z. (2018) · Cyberpsychology Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace · doi:10.5817/cp2018-1-1 · Cited by 36
Yue, C. A., Chung, Y. J., Kelleher, T., Bradshaw, A. S., & Ferguson, M. A. (2020) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1077699020943521 · Cited by 36
Pérez-Fernández, H., Escudero, A. I. R., Cruz, N. M., & García, J. B. D. (2021) · BRQ Business Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/23409444211062228 · Cited by 36
Self-disclosure to parents in emerging adulthood
Jiang, L., Yang, I. M., & Wang, C. (2016) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/0265407516640603 · Cited by 36
Deception in avatar-mediated virtual environment
Hooi, R., & Cho, H. (2012) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.09.004 · Cited by 34
Miller‐Ott, A. E., & Kelly, L. (2015) · Communication Studies · doi:10.1080/10510974.2015.1088876 · Cited by 35
Social Media Short Video-Sharing TikTok Application and Ethics
Meral, K. Z. (2021) · Advances in information security, privacy, and ethics book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-4117-3.ch010 · Cited by 35
Morgan, E. M., Richards, T. C., & VanNess, E. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.02.002 · Cited by 35
Predictors of honesty, intent, and valence of Facebook self-disclosure
Hollenbaugh, E. E., & Ferris, A. L. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.030 · Cited by 37
Cáceres, M. D., Román, J. A. R. S., & Brändle, G. (2009) · LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · doi:10.5209/ciyc.8070 · Cited by 34
Social Media and Gender Issues
Webb, L. M., & Temple, N. (2015) · Advances in media, entertainment and the arts (AMEA) book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-8310-5.ch025 · Cited by 34
Pang, H. (2018) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2018.08.009 · Cited by 34
Stranger Danger? Women's Self-Protection Intent and the Continuing Stigma of Online Dating
Cali, B. E., Coleman, J. M., & Campbell, C. (2013) · Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2012.0512 · Cited by 33
“In Sickness and in Health”? Disclosures of Genetic Risks in Dating
Klitzman, R., & Sweeney, M. M. (2010) · Journal of Genetic Counseling · doi:10.1007/s10897-010-9331-z · Cited by 33
Dealing with interactionally risky speech acts in simultaneous interpreting: The case of self-praise
Dayter, D. (2021) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2020.12.010 · Cited by 33
Online grooming legislation: Knee-jerk regulation?
Staksrud, E. (2013) · European Journal of Communication · doi:10.1177/0267323112471304 · Cited by 33
Muhtaseb, A., & Frey, L. R. (2008) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.00413.x · Cited by 33
Liu, Y., Liu, R., Ding, Y., Wang, J., Zhen, R., & Xu, L. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01279 · Cited by 33
Computer-Mediated Communication
Lee, E., & Oh, S. Y. (2015) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/obo/9780199756841-0160 · Cited by 34
Why Would You Decide to Use an Online Dating Site? Factors That Lead to Online Dating
Kang, T. A., & Hoffman, L. H. (2011) · Communication Research Reports · doi:10.1080/08824096.2011.566109 · Cited by 32
Exploring Affordances of Email for Team Learning Over Time
Erhardt, N., Gibbs, J., Martin‐Rios, C., & Sherblom, J. C. (2016) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496416635823 · Cited by 37
Self-citationOnline Dating: Changing Intimacy One Swipe at a Time?
Schwartz, P., & Velotta, N. (2018) · National symposium on family issues · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-95540-7_4 · Cited by 36
Zhang, S., Kwok, R. C.-W., Lowry, P. B., & Liu, Z. (2018) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/itp-04-2017-0134 · Cited by 33
McEwan, B. L. (2021) · Annals of the International Communication Association · doi:10.1080/23808985.2021.1880958 · Cited by 36
Value revelations: Disclosure is in the eye of the beholder.
Pronin, E., Fleming, J. J., & Steffel, M. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0012710 · Cited by 32
Women's Self-Objectification and Strategic Self-Presentation on Social Media
Chen, S., van Tilburg, W. A. P., & Leman, P. J. (2022) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1177/03616843221143751 · Cited by 50
Effects of Geographic Distribution on Dominance Perceptions in Computer-Mediated Groups
Peña, J. F., Walther, J. B., & Hancock, J. T. (2007) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650207300431 · Cited by 31
Personal blogs as online presences on the internet
Bronstein, J. (2013) · Aslib Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1108/00012531311313989 · Cited by 30
Insecure Attachment Styles and Phubbing: The Mediating Role of Problematic Smartphone Use
Sun, J., & Miller, C. H. (2023) · Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1155/2023/4331787 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Gibbs, J. L., Ellison, N. B., & Heino, R. D.
- Affiliations
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Michigan State University (US)
- Georgetown University (US)
- ORCID
- Ellison, Nicole B.
- Venue
- Communication Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-04
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 152-177
- ISSN
- 0093-6502 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3810
- OpenAlex
- W1969001298
- Cited by
- 701
- References
- 81
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 44
- FWCI
- 29.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Communication Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Digital Communication and Language
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Keywords
- self-disclosure, online dating, self-presentation, social penetration theory, social information processing, relational goals, face-to-face interaction, computer-mediated communication
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
