Cited by 1,616Attachment and Relationship DynamicsDigital Communication and LanguagePrivacy, Security, and Data Protection

Managing impressions online: Self-presentation processes in the online dating environment

Ellison, Nicole, Heino, Rebecca, Gibbs, Jennifer·2006·Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication

Abstract

This study investigates self-presentation strategies among online dating participants, exploring how participants manage their online presentation of self in order to accomplish the goal of finding a romantic partner. Thirty-four individuals active on a large online dating site participated in telephone interviews about their online dating experiences and perceptions. Qualitative data analysis suggests that participants attended to small cues online, mediated the tension between impression management pressures and the desire to present an authentic sense of self through tactics such as creating a profile that reflected their “ideal self,” and attempted to establish the veracity of their identity claims. This study provides empirical support for Social Information Processing theory in a naturalistic context while offering insight into the complicated way in which “honesty” is enacted online.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00020.x

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals control their self-presentation in online erotic encounters, which are not usually available in traditional or offline dating.

    “Individuals control their self-presentation in online erotic encounters (Ellison et al., 2006; Fullick, 2013; Toma, 2016; Toma & Hancock, 2010b; Toma et al., 2008; Whitty, 2008), which are not usually available in traditional or offline dating.”

    From Mobile Sexuality: Presentations of Young Filipinos in Dating Apps (2020) · cites this paper as Ellison et al., 2006

  • Online daters employ different strategies such as enhancing positive personality qualities while deemphasizing or altogether leaving out negative ones.

    “Online daters employ different strategies such as enhancing positive personality qualities (Ellison, Heino, & Gibbs, 2006; Ellison, Heino, & Toma, 2011) while deemphasizing or altogether leaving out negative ones (Toma & Carlson, 2012).”

    From Mobile Sexuality: Presentations of Young Filipinos in Dating Apps (2020) · cites this paper as Ellison, Heino, & Gibbs, 2006

  • Some informants mystified themselves when they concealed some information that they felt would be in contrast with their projected selves in the dating apps.

    “Some informants also mystified themselves when they concealed some information that they felt would be in contrast with their projected selves in the dating apps (Ellison et al., 2006; Goffman, 1956; Toma & Carlson, 2012; Toma, et al., 2008).”

    From Mobile Sexuality: Presentations of Young Filipinos in Dating Apps (2020) · cites this paper as Ellison et al., 2006

  • Users adapted to features of the platform during dating process, labelled 'creative workarounds'.

    “Nicole Ellison and colleagues (2006) labelled this adjustment as 'creative workarounds' wherein users adapted to the features of the platform during the dating process.”

    From Mobile Sexuality: Presentations of Young Filipinos in Dating Apps (2020) · cites this paper as Ellison et al., 2006

  • Some users mystified themselves by enhancing some qualities and deemphasizing the ones they felt were negative traits.

    “Some also mystified their selves by enhancing some qualities and deemphasizing the ones they felt were negative traits (Ellison et al., 2006; Gibbs et al., 2006; Toma et al., 2008; Toma & Carlson, 2012).”

    From Mobile Sexuality: Presentations of Young Filipinos in Dating Apps (2020) · cites this paper as Ellison et al., 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ellison, N., Heino, R., & Gibbs, J.
Affiliations
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • Georgetown University (US)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Venue
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication
Published
2006-01
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
415-441
ISSN
1083-6101 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1987318520
Cited by
1,616
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 98 · 2022: 103 · 2021: 83 · 2020: 102 · 2019: 115 · 2018: 85 · 2017: 92 · 2016: 116 · 2015: 108 · 2014: 95 · 2013: 83 · 2012: 97
FWCI
44.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Digital Communication and Language
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Keywords
online dating, self-presentation, impression management, online self-presentation, social information processing theory, online profiles, ideal self, authenticity, identity claims

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review