CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 269News Media Framing and Political CommunicationSocial Media and PoliticsElectoral Systems and Political Participation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 103 of the 104 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The “Spiral of Silence” Revisited: A Meta-Analysis on the Relationship Between Perceptions of Opinion Support and Political Opinion Expression

Matthes, Jörg, Knoll, Johannes, von Sikorski, Christian·2018·Communication Research
DOI 10.1177/0093650217745429
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The key assumption of spiral of silence theory is that opinion climate perceptions affect political opinion expression. We meta-analyzed the strength of this relationship and clarified the impact of theoretically relevant moderators. Sixty-six studies collectively including more than 27,000 participants were located. We observed a significant positive relationship ( r = .10; Zr = .10) between opinion climate and opinion expression. This relationship was not weaker in online as compared with offline opinion expression environments. Also, the relationship did not vary by the number of the targets of opinion expression, the opinion of the targets, the opinion climate characteristics, and the design, measurement, and sample characteristics. The largest silencing effect ( r = .34), however, was observed when participants talk to their family, friends, or neighbors about obtrusive issues. Overall, our findings suggest that the relationship between opinion climate perception and political opinion expression is stronger and more robust than previously thought.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0093650217745429

Cites

103 of 103 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 104 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. *Donsbach W., 1984, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association
  2. *Lee H., 1989, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication
  3. Lipsey M. W., 2001, Practical meta-analysis: Applied social research methods series
  4. *Liu X., 2009, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the ICA
  5. *Matera F. R., 1989, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the AEJMC
  6. Metzger M., 2009, The SAGE handbook of media process and effects, 561
  7. *Mohn E. L., 1983, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Association for Public Opinion Research
  8. *Noelle-Neumann E., 1973, Studies in Broadcasting, 9, 67
  9. Salmon C. T., 1985, Political communication yearbook, 1984, 3
  10. *Scherer H., 2008, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association
  11. *Spinda J. S. W., 2014, Kentucky Journal of Communication, 33, 44
  12. *Wang Z., 2004, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association
  13. *Xiadong Y., 2016, China Media Research, 12, 79
  14. *Yun H., 2007, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association
  15. Zucker H. G., 1978, Communication yearbook 2, 225

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Matthes, J., Knoll, J., & von Sikorski, C.
Affiliations
University of Vienna (AT)
Corresponding author
Matthes, Jörg
ORCID
Venue
Communication Research
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2017-12-12
Volume
45
Issue
1
Pages
3-33
ISSN
  • 0093-6502 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3810
DOI
10.1177/0093650217745429
OpenAlex
W2775519233
Cited by
269
References
104
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 5
FWCI
30.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
Communication Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › News Media Framing and Political Communication
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Keywords
spiral of silence, interpersonal communication, political communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review