The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
We Are the People and You Are Fake News: A Social Identity Approach to Populist Citizens’ False Consensus and Hostile Media Perceptions
Open accessAbstract
This study aims to investigate the relationships between citizens’ populist attitudes, perceptions of public opinion, and perceptions of mainstream news media. Relying on social identity theory as an explanatory framework, this article argues that populist citizens assume that public opinion is congruent with their own opinion and that mainstream media reporting is hostile toward their own views. To date, only anecdotal evidence suggests that both assumptions are true. The relationships are investigated in a cross-sectional survey with samples drawn from four Western European countries ( N = 3,354). Multigroup regression analysis supports our hypotheses: False consensus and hostile media perceptions can clearly be linked to populist attitudes in all four regions under investigation. Moreover, our findings show a gap between hostile media perceptions and congruent public opinion perceptions, which increases with increasing populist attitudes to the point that the persuasive press inference mechanism is annulled.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01 · Cited by 86,835
A theory of social comparison processes
Festinger, L. (1954) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872675400700202 · Cited by 20,926
The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes
Ross, L., Greene, D., & House, P. (1977) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(77)90049-x · Cited by 3,139
Müller, J.-W. (2016) · doi:10.9783/9780812293784 · Cited by 2,219
How Populist Are the People? Measuring Populist Attitudes in Voters
Akkerman, A., Mudde, C., & Zaslove, A. (2014) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414013512600 · Cited by 1,148
What unites the voter bases of populist parties? Comparing the electorates of 15 populist parties
Rooduijn, M. (2018) · European Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s1755773917000145 · Cited by 513
Matthes, J., Knoll, J., & von Sikorski, C. (2018) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650217745429 · Cited by 269
Cited by
State of the field: How to study populism and adjacent topics? A plea for both more and less focus
Rooduijn, M. (2019) · European Journal of Political Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12314 · Cited by 300
Political Psychology in the Digital (mis)Information age: A Model of News Belief and Sharing
Van Bavel, J. J., Harris, E. A., Pärnamets, P., Rathje, S., Doell, K. C., & Tucker, J. A. (2021) · Social Issues and Policy Review · doi:10.1111/sipr.12077 · Cited by 213
How Politics Shape Views Toward Fact-Checking: Evidence from Six European Countries
Lyons, B., Mérola, V., Reifler, J., & Stoeckel, F. (2020) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/1940161220921732 · Cited by 82
Between Mainstream and Alternative – Co-orientation in Right-Wing Populist Alternative News Media
Frischlich, L., Klapproth, J., & Brinkschulte, F. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-39627-5_12 · Cited by 57
Berti, C. (2021) · Media, Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/0163443720957564 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Schulz, A., Wirth, W., & Müller, P.
- Venue
- Communication Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-08-21
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 201-226
- ISSN
- 0093-6502 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3810
- OpenAlex
- W2888131728
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 91.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: We Are the People and You Are Fake News: A Social Identity Approach to Populist Citizens’ False Consensus and Hostile Media Perceptions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0093650218794854
- The paper
- Schulz, A., Wirth, W., & Müller, P. (2020). We Are the People and You Are Fake News: A Social Identity Approach to Populist Citizens’ False Consensus and Hostile Media Perceptions. Communication Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650218794854
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
