Cited by 3,139Social and Intergroup PsychologyPersonality Traits and PsychologyPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes

Ross, Lee, Greene, David, House, Pamela·1977·Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0022-1031(77)90049-x

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Naïve realism produces the false-consensus effect, the mistaken assumption that one's conclusions are widely shared by others.

    “Naïve realism produces the “false-consensus effect,” or the mistaken assumption that one's conclusions are widely shared by others (Ross et al., 1977).”
  • In the Ross et al. (1977) survey, 99.7% of surveyed GPT-3.5 runs (1027 of 1030) chose to sign the release, and 0.3% (3) refused.

    “However, in our GPT sample (N = 1030), 99.7% of surveyed GPT-3.5 runs (a total of 1027) chose to sign the release, and only 0.3% of them (a total of just three) refused.”

    From Diminished diversity-of-thought in a standard large language model (2024) · cites this paper as Ross et al. (1977)

  • For the Ross et al. (1977) false-consensus traffic-ticket scenario and the Hsee (1998) less-is-better effect, the GPT sample successfully replicated both the original result and the corresponding Many Labs 2 result.

    “For the study of Ross et al. (1977), testing the false-consensus effect on the traffic ticket scenario and the study of Hsee (1998) on the less-is-better effect, our GPT sample successfully replicated both the original result and the corresponding Many Labs 2 result.”

    From Diminished diversity-of-thought in a standard large language model (2024) · cites this paper as Ross et al. (1977)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ross, L., Greene, D., & House, P.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1977-05
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
279-301
ISSN
0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2088614984
Cited by
3,139
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 105 · 2025: 128 · 2024: 163 · 2023: 101 · 2022: 117 · 2021: 148 · 2020: 173 · 2019: 137 · 2018: 160 · 2017: 105 · 2016: 120 · 2015: 101 · 2014: 101 · 2013: 123 · 2012: 122
FWCI
45.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
false consensus effect, egocentric bias, social perception, attribution, perceived consensus, social inference, personality dispositions, cognitive biases, perceptual mechanisms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review