The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Political Knowledge and the Campaign Media of 1992
Abstract
Effects of various mass media on political learning during the 1992 presidential campaign are examined via analyses of two voter surveys conducted in different states. Three indicators of political knowledge are compared: differences on issues between parties (Republican vs. Democratic), differences on issues among candidates (Bush vs. Clinton vs. Perot), and personal knowledge about the candidates (Bush, Clinton, and Perot). Campaign media, including both news coverage and special events (conventions, debates), added significantly to the prediction of both kinds of knowledge about the candidates, even after controlling for major demographic variables and for habitual uses of news media. Of the new forms of media campaigning that became prominent in 1992, at least the interview / talk show format apparently added to voter learning about candidates. Television sources of various types tended to contribute more to learning about the candidates, whereas the newspaper was the medium more associated with knowledge of policy differences between the two major parties.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Johnson, T. J., & Kaye, B. K. (2004) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/107769900408100310 · Cited by 715
Dimitrova, D. V., Shehata, A., Strömbäck, J., & Nord, L. W. (2014) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650211426004 · Cited by 507
EVELAND, W. P. (2001) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365001028005001 · Cited by 499
Campaigns, Reflection, and Deliberation: Advancing an O-S-R-O-R Model of Communication Effects
Cho, J., Shah, D. V., McLeod, J. M., McLeod, D. M., Scholl, R. M., & Gotlieb, M. R. (2009) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.01333.x · Cited by 361
EVELAND, W. P., & DUNWOODY, S. (2001) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365001028001002 · Cited by 254
Metadata
- Authors
- CHAFFEE, S. H., ZHAO, X., & LESHNER, G.
- Venue
- Communication Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1994-06
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 305-324
- ISSN
- 0093-6502 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3810
- OpenAlex
- W2081882312
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Political Knowledge and the Campaign Media of 1992. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/009365094021003004
- The paper
- CHAFFEE, S. H., ZHAO, X., & LESHNER, G. (1994). Political Knowledge and the Campaign Media of 1992. Communication Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365094021003004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.