Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 164Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceCrime Patterns and InterventionsStalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

He Hits, She Hits: Assessing Gender Differences and Similarities in Officially Reported Intimate Partner Violence

Melton, Heather C., Belknap, Joanne·2003·Criminal Justice and Behavior

Abstract

Within the study of intimate partner violence (IPV), controversy exists over whether perpetration and victimization of domestic violence is gender specific (gendered). Some researchers maintain no or few gender differences in IPV offending and victimization, particularly at less severe levels. Others argue that IPV is highly gendered and perpetrated largely by men against their female partners and expartners. Using officially collected data (through pretrial services and police reports) in a large Midwestern city, this study examined 2,670 IPV cases of which 14% had female defendants. This study was an effort to further clarify the debate regarding gender differences and similarities in reports of perpetration, victimization, context, and consequences of IPV. The two political and research perspectives that guide this debate, the family violence and feminist perspectives, are also discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0093854803030003004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. 10.1177/1077801297003005002 · DOI
  2. 10.1891/0886-6708.10.2.133 · DOI
  3. 10.1177/089124390004001005 · DOI
  4. 10.1007/BF01531958 · DOI
  5. 10.1007/BF02110993 · DOI
  6. 10.1891/0886-6708.10.2.143 · DOI
  7. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a047453 · DOI
  8. 10.1177/1077801298004004002 · DOI
  9. 10.2307/3096914 · DOI
  10. Erez, E. & Belknap, J. (1998). Battered women and the criminal justice system: The service providers perspective. European Journal of Criminal Justice, 6, 37-57. · DOI
  11. 10.1023/A:1021935610051 · DOI
  12. 10.1177/1077801297003004005 · DOI
  13. 10.1891/0886-6708.9.2.125 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/S1359-1789(96)00017-1 · DOI
  15. 10.2307/353683 · DOI
  16. 10.1037/0022-006X.65.1.68 · DOI
  17. 10.1023/A:1022832610728 · DOI
  18. 10.1080/07418828400088101 · DOI
  19. 10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00180.x · DOI
  20. Moffit, T. & Caspi, A. (1999). Findings about partner violence from the Dunedine Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice. · DOI
  21. 10.1891/0886-6708.10.4.251 · DOI
  22. 10.1037/0022-006X.57.2.263 · DOI
  23. Rennison, C. M. & Welchans, S. (2000). Intimate partner violence (U.S. Department of Justice report). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. · DOI
  24. 10.1891/0886-6708.1.1.47 · DOI
  25. 10.1177/089124394008001007 · DOI
  26. Stets, J. E. & Straus, M. A. (1990). Gender differences in reporting marital violence and its medical and psychological consequences. In M. Straus & R. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families (pp. 151-165). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishing. · DOI
  27. Straus, M. & Gelles, R. (1990). Physical violence in American families. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishing. · DOI
  28. 10.1177/10778010022181769 · DOI
  29. 10.1891/0886-6708.9.2.107 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Melton, H. C., & Belknap, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Utah (US)
  • University of Colorado
Venue
Criminal Justice and Behavior
Published
2003-06
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
328-348
ISSN
  • 0093-8548 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3594
OpenAlex
W2055687369
Cited by
164
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 12
FWCI
1.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Criminal Justice and Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
Keywords
intimate partner violence, gender differences, women offenders, women victims, domestic violence, gender-based violence, feminist perspectives, police reports, pretrial services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.