Cited by 167Policing Practices and PerceptionsDeception detection and forensic psychologyCriminal Law and Evidence

“Contagious Accountability”: A Global Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effect of Police Body-Worn Cameras on Citizens’ Complaints Against the Police

Open access
Ariel, Barak, Sutherland, Alex, Henstock, Darren, Young, Josh, Drover, Paul, Sykes, Jayne, Megicks, Simon, Henderson, Ryan·2017·Criminal Justice and Behavior

Abstract

The use of body-worn cameras (BWCs) by the police is rising. One proposed effect of BWCs is reducing complaints against police, which assumes that BWCs reduce officer noncompliance with procedures, improve suspects’ demeanor, or both, leading to fewer complaints. We report results from a global, multisite randomized controlled trial on whether BWC use reduces citizens’ complaints. Seven discrete tests ( N = 1,847 officers), with police shifts as the unit of analysis ( N = 4,264), were randomly assigned into treatment and control conditions. Using a prospective meta-analytic approach, we found a 93% before–after reduction in complaint incidence ( Z = −3.234; p < .001), but no significant differences between trial arms in the studies ( d = .053, SE = .11; 95% confidence interval [CI] = [−.163, .269]), and little between-site variation ( Q = 4.905; p = .428). We discuss these results in terms of an “observer effect” that influences both officers’ and citizens’ behavior and assess what we interpret as treatment diffusion between experimental and control conditions within the framework of “contagious accountability.”

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0093854816668218

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ariel, B., Sutherland, A., Henstock, D., Young, J., Drover, P., Sykes, J., Megicks, S., & Henderson, R.
Affiliations
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
  • RAND Europe (GB)
  • West Midlands Police (GB)
  • Ventura Police Department
  • West Yorkshire Police (GB)
  • Cambridgeshire Constabulary
  • Police Service of Northern Ireland (GB)
Corresponding author
Ariel, Barak
Venue
Criminal Justice and Behavior
Published
2016-09-24
Volume
44
Issue
2
Pages
293-316
ISSN
  • 0093-8548 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3594
OpenAlex
W2523124698
Cited by
167
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 2
FWCI
107.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Criminal Justice and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Apollo (cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Law and Evidence
Keywords
body-worn cameras, police accountability, citizen complaints against police, observer effect, police-suspect interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review