Cited by 63Crime Patterns and InterventionsCriminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisCriminal Justice and Penology

Hate Crimes Hurt More, but so Do Co-Offenders: Separating the Influence of Co-Offending and Bias on Hate-Motivated Physical Injury

Lantz, Brendan, Kim, Joonggon·2019·Criminal Justice and Behavior

Abstract

One of the primary motivations for hate crime laws is that hate crimes “hurt more.” But hate crimes are often committed by groups, and research indicates that crimes committed by groups are also more violent than other crimes. This research focuses on one type of harm, physical injury, asking, are hate crimes more violent because they involve co-offenders or because of the bias motivation behind the incident? Results using data from the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) indicate that hate crimes are positively associated with serious injury, but that this association is partially driven by co-offenders. More importantly, co-offending moderates this relationship: Incidents involving bias and co-offending are especially violent. Anti-sexual orientation incidents were an exception to this pattern, however, and are likely to be violent regardless of co-offending. These results suggest that hate crimes do hurt more, but that this relationship is partially attributable to the influence of co-offenders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0093854818810314

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Collaborating facilitates behaviour that acting alone does not.

    “In simple terms, collaborating facilitates behaviour that acting alone does not, a premise supported by a range of empirical evidence (e.g. McGloin & Piquero, 2009; Warr, 2002; Lantz & Kim, 2019).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lantz, B., & Kim, J.
Affiliations
Florida State University (US)
Corresponding author
Kim, Joonggon
Venue
Criminal Justice and Behavior
Published
2018-11-12
Volume
46
Issue
3
Pages
437-456
ISSN
  • 0093-8548 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3594
OpenAlex
W2901479178
Cited by
63
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5
FWCI
11.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Criminal Justice and Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
Keywords
hate crimes, co-offending, group offending, personal injury, violence, hate crime legislation, National Incident-Based Reporting System, moderating effect

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review