The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Enigma of Capital: and the Crises of Capitalism
Abstract
Es posible pensar la crisis economica actual como el resultado de una matriz multidimensional de causas sistemicas que operan de acuerdo con un numero finito de dinamicas estructurales y de variables geoeconomicas y geopoliticas cuyas logicas definen la reproduccion de la estructura social de acuerdo con las pautas de comportamiento generadas por el capitalismo historico o tan solo debemos interpretarla como el desajuste parcial de un sistema economico que carece de historia y racionalidad sistemica y cuya logica unicamente puede reconstruirse de acuerdo con el concepto neoclasico y neoliberal de mercado y con el modelo de eleccion racional del homo economicus? ?Es la crisis que arranca de 2008-2009 una crisis antropologica y etica, una crisis del mercado y de sus modos de organizacion de la competencia, una crisis de los modelos de regulacion y de governance inspirados por el frame neoliberal impuesto durante las ultimas decadas o estamos ante una crisis del capitalismo concebido como sistema de reproduccion social y de los equilibrios de su ultimo ciclo sistemico de acumulacion estadounidense asi como de las relaciones de fuerza existentes entre los sujetos colectivos que se involucran en los procesos de produccion y de reproduccion social y en la traduccion politica de sus necesidades en los ambitos nacionales, regionales y globales? ?Es posible ofrecer una interpretacion de la crisis de acuerdo con el concepto estandar de racionalidad economica que inspira los paradigmas interpretativos predominantes en las ciencias sociales y humanas contemporaneas o es preciso recurrir simultaneamente a una teoria coherente del capitalismo como sistema social e historico y a una teoria del poder inherente al mismo que nos ofrezcan herramientas para comprender el ciclo integral de la dominacion y la explotacion social, politica, economica y cultural que definen los contornos de un momento historico determinado?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Critical discourse analysis and critical policy studies
Fairclough, N. (2013) · Critical Policy Studies · doi:10.1080/19460171.2013.798239 · Cited by 698
Theorizing the Bioeconomy: Biovalue, Biocapital, Bioeconomics or . . . What?
Birch, K., & Tyfield, D. (2013) · Science, Technology, & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243912442398 · Cited by 355
Race, Class, Ethnicity, and Disaster Vulnerability
Bolin, B., & Kurtz, L. C. (2018) · Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-63254-4_10 · Cited by 256
The limits of transparency: Data brokers and commodification
Crain, M. (2018) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444816657096 · Cited by 237
Wright, W. J. (2020) · Annals of the American Association of Geographers · doi:10.1080/24694452.2019.1664890 · Cited by 199
Metadata
- Venue
- Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-04-22
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 366-367
- ISSN
- 0094-3061 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-8638
- OpenAlex
- W1502624808
- Cited by
- 1,422
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 683.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Enigma of Capital: and the Crises of Capitalism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0094306110404516g
- The paper
- The Enigma of Capital: and the Crises of Capitalism. (2011). Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094306110404516g
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.