Cited by 256Disaster Management and ResilienceEnvironmental Justice and Health DisparitiesEarthquake and Disaster Impact Studies

Race, Class, Ethnicity, and Disaster Vulnerability

Bolin, Bob, Kurtz, Liza C.·2018·Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-63254-4_10

Cites

118 of 118 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

11 of the 129 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bolin, B., & Kurtz, L. C.
Affiliations
Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
Bolin, Bob
Venue
Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research
Published
2017-11-17
Pages
181-203
ISSN
1389-6903 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4210952414
Cited by
256
References
129
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 6
FWCI
89.39
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Handbooks of sociology and social research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies
Keywords
disaster vulnerability, race, class, ethnicity, social inequality, critical race theory, political ecology, critical geography, Indian Ocean tsunami, Hurricane Katrina, environmental justice, Navajo Nation, radiation hazards

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review