Cited by 132Gender Diversity and InequalityPublic Policy and Administration ResearchGlobal and Cross-Cultural Management

Rethinking Diversity in Public Organizations for the 21st Century: Moving toward a Multicultural Model

Open access
Selden, Sally Coleman, Selden, Frank·2001·Administration & Society

Abstract

The 21st century promises a more diverse public workplace in terms of race, ethnicity, culture, gender, age, and disabilities. In light of the shifting composition of public organizations, this article applies three different paradigms of diversity developed to understand private organizations and analyze practices in and research about public organizations. Building on these paradigms, this article proposes a new process for managing diversity that facilitates the development and promulgation of a multicultural organization. This paradigm of multiculturalism cultivates a climate in which individuals from dominant and nondominant cultures coexist and thrive. Consequently, agencies will be more effective in recruiting and retaining a diverse workforce, structuring internal processes, and serving clients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/00953990122019785

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 64

  1. Booth, W. (1998). Diversity and division: American's new wage of immigration is changing its "melting pot" image. The Washington Post National, Weekly Edition, pp. 6-8.
  2. Cayer, N. J., & Sigelman, L. (1980). Minorities and women in state and local government: 1973-1975. Public Administration Review, 40 , 443-450.
  3. Chambers, T., & Riccucci, N. M. (1997). Models of excellence in workplace diversity. In C. Ban & N. Riccucci (Eds.), Public personnel management: Current concerns, future challenges (pp. 73-90). New York: Longman.
  4. Daley, D. (1984). Political and occupational barriers to the implementation of affirmative action: Administrative, executive, and legislative attitudes toward representative bureau- cracy. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 4, 4-15.
  5. Davis, C., & West, J. (1985). Implementing public programs: Equal opportunity, affirmative action, and administrative policy options. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 4, 16-30.
  6. Duerst-Lahti, G., & Johnson, C. M. (1992). Management styles, stereotypes, and advan- tages. In M. E. Guy (Ed.), Women and men of the states: Public administrators at the state level (pp. 125-156). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe. Dye, T., & Renick, J. (1981). Political power and city jobs: Determinants of minority employment. Social Science Quarterly, 62, 475-486.
  7. Fullerton, H. N., Jr. (1999, November). Labor force projections to 2008: Steady growth and changing composition. Monthly Labor Review, 19-32.
  8. Guinier, L. (1994). The tyranny of the majority: Fundamental fairness in representative democracy. New York: Free Press.
  9. Guy, M. E. (1994). Organizational architecture, gender, and women's careers. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 14, 77-90.
  10. Guy, M. E., & Duerst-Lahti, G. (1992). Agency culture and its effect on managers. In M. E. Guy (Ed.), Women and men of the states: Public administration at the state level (pp. 157-188). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe. Guy, M. E., & Duke, L. L. (1992). Personal and social background as determinants of posi- tion. In M. E. Guy (Ed.), Women and men of the states: Public administration at the state level (pp. 43-60). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe. Guy, M. E., & Newman, M. A. (1998). Toward diversity in the workplace. In S. E. Condrey (Ed.), Handbook of human resource management in government (pp. 75-92). San Fran- cisco: Jossey-Bass.
  11. Hale, M. M. (1999). He says, she says: Gender and worklife. Public Administration Review, 59, 410-424.
  12. Hale, M. M., & Branch, M. F. (1992). Policy preferences on workplace reform. In M. E. Guy (Ed.), Women and men of the states: Public administration at the state level (pp. 157- 188). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
  13. Herbert, A. W. (1974). The minority administrator: Problems, prospects, and challenges. Public Administration Review, 34, 556-563.
  14. Hindera, J. J. (1993a). Representative bureaucracy: Further evidence of active representation in the EEOC district offices. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3, 415-429.
  15. Hindera, J. J. (1993b). Representative bureaucracy: Imprimis evidence of active representa- tion in the EEOC district offices. Social Science Quarterly, 74, 95-108.
  16. Hutchins, M., & Sigelman, L. (1981). Black employment in state and local government: A comparative analysis. Social Science Quarterly, 62, 79-87.
  17. Jones, E. E. (1985). Psychotherapy an counseling with Black clients. In P. B. Pedersen (Ed.), Handbook of cross-cultural counseling and therapy (pp. 173-179). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
  18. Kellough, J. E. (1990). Integration in the public workplace: Determinants of minority and female employment in federal agencies. Public Administration Review, 50, 557-566.
  19. Kellough, J. E., & Elliot, E. E. (1992). Demographic and organizational influences on racial/ethnic and gender integration in federal agencies. Social Science Quarterly, 73, 1-11.
  20. Kellough, J. E., Selden, S. C., & Legge, J. (1997). Affirmative action under fire: The current controversy and the potential for state policy retrenchment. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 17, 52-74.
  21. Kingsley, J. D. (1944). Representative bureaucracy. Yellow Springs, OH: Antioch Press.
  22. Krislov, S. (1967). The Negro in federal employment: The quest for equal opportunity. Min- neapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  23. Krislov, S. (1974). Representative bureaucracy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  24. Lambs, J. J. (1996). Today's priorities may not be tomorrow's: Eyeing future HR concerns. Personnel Journal, 75, 28-35.
  25. Lewis, G. B. (1997). Race, sex, and performance ratings in the federal service. Public Administration Review, 57, 479-489.
  26. Lewis, W. G. (1989). Toward representative bureaucracy: Blacks in city police organization, 1975-1985. Public Administration Review, 49, 257-268.
  27. McLeod, P. L., & Lobel, S. A. (1992). The effects of ethnic diversity on idea generation in small groups. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, 227-231.
  28. Meier, K. J. (1975). Representative bureaucracy: An empirical analysis. American Political Science Review, 69, 526-542.
  29. Meier, K. J. (1993a). Latinos and representative bureaucracy: Testing the Thompson and Henderson hypotheses. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3, 393-414.
  30. Meier, K. J., & Nigro, L. (1976). Representative bureaucracy and policy references: A study in the attitudes of federal executives. Public Administration Review, 36, 458-469.
  31. Meier, K. J., & Stewart, J. (1992). The impact of representative bureaucracies: Educational systems and public policies. American Review of Public Administration, 22, 157-171.
  32. Meier, K. J., Wrinkle, R.D., & Polinard, J.L. (1999). Representative bureaucracy and distri- butional equity: Addressing the hard question. The Journal of Politics, 61, 1025-1039.
  33. Milliken, F. J., & Martins, L. L. (1996). Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 21, 402-433.
  34. Mladenka, K. R. (1991). Public employee unions, reformism, and Black employment in 1,200 American cities. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 26, 532-548.
  35. Mosher, F. (1968). Democracy and the public service (1st ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
  36. Nachmias, D., & Rosenbloom, D. H. (1973). Measuring bureaucratic representation and integration. Public Administration Review, 33, 590-597.
  37. Nemeth, C. J. (1986). Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psycho- logical Review, 93, 23-32.
  38. Newman, M. A. (1993). Equal employment opportunity and glass ceilings: A contradiction in terms? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Deakin University.
  39. Pulakos, E. D., Oppler, S. H., White, L. A., & Borman, W. C. (1989). Examination of race and sex effects on performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 770-780.
  40. Riccucci, N. M. (1997a). The legal status of affirmative action: Past development, future prospects. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 17, 22-37.
  41. Riccucci, N. M. (1997b). Will affirmative action survive into the twenty-first century? In C. Ban & N. Riccucci (Eds.), Public personnel management: Current concerns, future challenges (pp. 57-72). New York: Longman.
  42. Rosenbloom, D. (1973). The Civil Service Commission's decision to authorize the use of goals and timetables in the federal equal employment opportunity program. Western Political Quarterly, 26, 236-251.
  43. Rosenbloom, D., & Berry, C. R. (1984). The Civil Service Reform Act and EEO: The record to date. In P. Ingraham & C. Ban (Eds.), Legislating bureaucratic change: The Civil Ser- vice Reform Act of 1978 (pp. 181-199). Albany: State University of New York Press.
  44. Rosenbloom, D. H., & Featherstonhaugh, J. G. (1977). Passive and active representation in the federal service: A comparison of Blacks and Whites. Social Science Quarterly, 57, 873-882.
  45. Rosenbloom, D. H., & Kinnard, D. (1977). Bureaucratic representation and bureaucratic behavior: An exploratory analysis. Midwest Review of Public Administration, 11, 35-42.
  46. Rosenthal, N. H. (1999, May). The quality of BLS projections: A historical account. Monthly Labor Review, pp. 27-35.
  47. Rourke, F. E. (1978). Bureaucratic power in national politics (3rd ed.). Boston: Little, Brown.
  48. Sackett, P. R., & DuBois, C.L.Z. (1991). Rater-ratee race effects on performance evaluation challenging meta-analytic conclusions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 873-877.
  49. Saltzstein, G. H. (1986). Female mayors and women in municipal jobs. American Journal of Political Science, 30, 140-164.
  50. Schein, E. H. (1992). Organizational culture and leadership (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  51. Sigelman, L., & Karnig, A. K. (1976). Black representation in the American states: A com- parison of bureaucracies and legislatures. American Politics Quarterly, 4 , 237-246.
  52. Sigelman, L., & Karnig, A. K. (1977). Black education and bureaucratic employment. Social Science Quarterly, 57, 858-863.
  53. Simon, H. A. (1957). Administrative behavior (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
  54. Slack, J. D. (1997b). From affirmative action to full spectrum diversity in the American workplace. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 17, 75-87.
  55. Smith, R. (1980). Representative bureaucracy: A research note on demographic representa- tion in state bureaucracies. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 1, 1-14.
  56. Stanback, M. H., & Pearce, W. B. (1985). Talking to "the man": Some communication strate- gies used by members of "subordinate" social groups. In L. A. Samovar & R. E. Porter (Eds.), Intercultural communication: A reader (pp. 286-291). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
  57. Sue, D. W., & Sue, D. (1990). Counseling the culturally different: Theory and practice. New York: John Wiley.
  58. Thielemann, G., & Stewart, J. (1996). A demand-side perspective on the importance of rep- resentative bureaucracy: AIDS, ethnicity, gender, and sexual orientation. Public Admin- istration Review, 56, 168-173.
  59. Thomas, D. A., & Ely, R. J. (1996). Making differences matter: A new paradigm for manag- ing diversity. Harvard Business Review, 74, 79-91.
  60. Thompson, F. J. (1978). Civil servants and the deprived: Socio-political and occupational explanations of attitudes toward minority hiring. American Journal of Political Science, 22, 325-347.
  61. Watson, W. E., Kumar, K., & Michaelsen, L. K. (1993). Cultural diversity's impact on inter- action process and performance: Comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 590-602.
  62. Wise, F., & Miller, N. B. (1983). The mental health of American Indian children. In G. J. Powell, J. Yamamoto, A. Romero, & A. Morales (Eds.), The psychosocial development of minority group children (pp. 344-361). New York: Brunner/Mazel.
  63. Wise, L. R. (1990). Social equity in civil service systems. Public Administration Review, 50, 567-575.
  64. Sally Coleman Selden is an associate professor of management at Lynchburg Col- lege. Dr. Selden's fields of interest encompass management and human resource management. She is the author of The Promise of Representative Bureaucracy: Diversity and Responsiveness in a Government Agency (M. E. Sharp). Her articles have appeared in Administration & Society, American Journal of Political Science, American Review of Public Administration, Review of Public Personnel Adminis- tration, Journal of Public Administration Education, Public Administration Review, and Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Selden, S. C., & Selden, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Lynchburg (US)
  • Centra Health (US)
Venue
Administration & Society
Published
2001-07
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
303-329
ISSN
  • 0095-3997 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3039
OpenAlex
W2048593958
Cited by
132
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Administration & Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Global and Cross-Cultural Management
Keywords
workplace diversity, public sector organizations, multiculturalism, diversity management, race and ethnicity, gender, age, disability, recruitment and retention, organizational climate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review