When to Feed the Patient With Gastrointestinal Bleeding
Abstract
Whether to provide artificial enteral nutrition therapy to a patient with evidence of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) creates a difficult clinical dilemma. Concern that enteral feeding may contribute to the morbidity associated with GIB leads to delays in initiating enteral therapy or to cessation of feeding in the patient in whom artificial nutrition support has already been started. Surprisingly, evidence of GIB is not an automatic contraindication to further enteral feeding. Depending on the etiology of the GIB, enteral nutrition may protect the gut mucosa and reduce further bleeding in some patients, actually increase risk for rebleeding in other patients, or serve as a moot point with no relation to further bleeding or morbidity in still other patients. In many cases, an endoscopic evaluation is needed to distinguish the differential etiology of the GIB. The nutrition support specialist needs a full understanding of the physiology behind the varying diagnoses for GIB to know whether feedings can be initiated or continued or whether enteral feedings need to be withheld for 48-72 hours until risk for rebleeding and further morbidity is minimized.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Although lower gastrointestinal bleeding encompasses a wide clinical spectrum, in the majority of patients, bleeding stops spontaneously.
“Although lower gastrointestinal bleeding encompasses a wide clinical spectrum, in the majority 1632 of patients, bleeding stops spontaneously [219, 220].”
From ESPEN guideline on hospital nutrition (2021) · cites this paper as [220]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on nutrition in chronic liver disease
Merli, M., Berzigotti, A., Zelber-Sagi, S., Dasarathy, S., Montagnese, S., Genton, L., Plauth, M., & Parés, A. (2019) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2018.06.024 · Cited by 1,130 · see citing works
ESPEN guideline on hospital nutrition
Thibault, R., Abbasoglu, O., Ioannou, E., Meija, L., Ottens-Oussoren, K., Pichard, C., Rothenberg, E., Rubin, D., Siljamäki-Ojansuu, U., Vaillant, M.-F., et al. (2021) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2021.09.039 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
- Authors
- McClave, S. A., & Chang, W.
- Affiliations
- University of Louisville (US)
- Tri-Service General Hospital (TW)
- Corresponding author
- McClave, Stephen A.
- ORCID
- McClave, Stephen A.
- Venue
- Nutrition in Clinical Practice
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-10
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 544-550
- ISSN
- 0884-5336 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-2452
- OpenAlex
- W2114359242
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nutrition in Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Abdominal vascular conditions and treatments
- Keywords
- gastrointestinal bleeding, enteral nutrition, rebleeding risk, endoscopy, timing of enteral feeding, bleeding etiology
- MeSH terms
- Contraindications, Acute Disease, Critical Care, Enteral Nutrition, Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage, Humans
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review