Cited by 24Misinformation and Its ImpactsPharmaceutical industry and healthcareHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility

Vulnerabilities to misinformation in online pharmaceutical marketing

Open access
De Freitas, Julian, Falls, Brian A, Haque, Omar S, Bursztajn, Harold J·2013·Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine

Abstract

Given the large percentage of Internet users who search for health information online, pharmaceutical companies have invested significantly in online marketing of their products. Although online pharmaceutical marketing can potentially benefit both physicians and patients, it can also harm these groups by misleading them. Indeed, some pharmaceutical companies have been guilty of undue influence, which has threatened public health and trust. We conducted a review of the available literature on online pharmaceutical marketing, undue influence and the psychology of decision-making, in order to identify factors that contribute to Internet users’ vulnerability to online pharmaceutical misinformation. We find five converging factors: Internet dependence, excessive trust in the veracity of online information, unawareness of pharmaceutical company influence, social isolation and detail fixation. As the Internet continues to change, it is important that regulators keep in mind not only misinformation that surrounds new web technologies and their contents, but also the factors that make Internet users vulnerable to misinformation in the first place. Psychological components are a critical, although often neglected, risk factor for Internet users becoming misinformed upon exposure to online pharmaceutical marketing. Awareness of these psychological factors may help Internet users attentively and safely navigate an evolving web terrain.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0141076813476679

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Haque OS, De Freitas J, Bursztajn HJ, et al. The Ethics of Pharmaceutical Industry Influence in Medicine. UNESCO, in press
  2. World's Data More Than Doubling Every Two Years -Driving Big Data Opportunity, New IT Roles [Internet]. EMC Corporation, 2011. See http://www.emc.com/about/ news/press/2011/20110628-01.htm (last checked 19 December 2011)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De Freitas, J., Falls, B. A., Haque, O. S., & Bursztajn, H. J.
Affiliations
  • Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Bursztajn, Harold J
Venue
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
Published
2013-05
Volume
106
Issue
5
Pages
184-189
ISSN
  • 0141-0768 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1095
OpenAlex
W2315308785
Cited by
24
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3
FWCI
4.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Keywords
health misinformation, undue influence, pharmaceutical industry, internet addiction, trust in online information, social isolation, psychology of decision making, health information seeking, online regulation
MeSH terms
Communication, Drug Industry, Humans, Social Isolation, Internet, Trust, Marketing, Information Seeking Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review