Cited by 305COVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsCOVID-19 and Mental Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Uncertainty and COVID-19: how are we to respond?

Open access
Koffman, Jonathan, Gross, Jamie, Etkind, Simon Noah, Selman, Lucy·2020·Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine

Abstract

As if writing prophetically about the global Covid-19 pandemic, in 1984 Eddy suggested, “Uncertainty creeps into medical practice through every pore. Whether a physician is defining a disease, making a diagnosis, selecting a procedure, observing outcomes, assessing probabilities, assigning preferences, or putting it all together, he (or she) is walking on very slippery terrain” 1. Covid-19 has rapidly become a disease associated with unbridled uncertainty with its aetiology and management, for the healthcare systems and health professionals who provide care, and among its ultimate victims, patients and their families.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0141076820930665

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 19 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 305

Metadata

Authors
Koffman, J., Gross, J., Etkind, S. N., & Selman, L.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • London North West Healthcare NHS Trust (GB)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
Corresponding author
Koffman, Jonathan
Venue
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
Published
2020-06
Volume
113
Issue
6
Pages
211-216
ISSN
  • 0141-0768 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1095
OpenAlex
W3025624029
Cited by
305
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 76 · 2022: 67 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 5
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (ACF-2012-17-020, CDF-2018-11-ST2-009)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, uncertainty, clinical decision-making, clinical uncertainty, pandemic response, diagnosis, treatment management
MeSH terms
Clinical Decision-Making, Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Family, Health Personnel, Humans, Physician's Role, Pneumonia, Viral, Prognosis, Coronavirus Infections, Critical Pathways, Needs Assessment, Uncertainty, Emotional Intelligence, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review