The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Early History of Wound Treatment
Open accessAbstract
Introduction Wounds cause pain, bleeding, disability and death. They have always been common and the problems associated with their treatment are as old as mankind and advances in the care of wounds have advanced the whole art of surgery. The history of surgery has been the history of wound therapy during the last four or five millenia and, despite the causes of the injury generally being obvious and the wound easily observed, it is only in the last two to three decades that the processes occurring in the wound and the factors influencing them have been understood. The aim of wound treatment has always been to reduce the risks caused by the wound itself and to minimize potential complications. Pain, hadmorrhage, loss of skin continuity and tissue substance in a wound have tested man's ingenuity throughout the ages. It is difficult to find out how prehistoric man discovered the multitude of wound coverings, salves or ointments that were, in all probability, used. He probably observed that a covered wound bled less, or that pressure stilled a more serious haemorrhage. Certain plant extracts may have acted as styptics. Cold water, snow or ice or the application ofherbs or clay may not only have soothed pain but hastened healing. It can only be assumed that the selection of these substances occurred by trial and error over a very considerable time. The result was that a number of effective topical treatments had become available by the time civilizations began to appear about six thousand years ago.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Healing Hand: Man and Wound in the Ancient World
LOEFFEL, E. D. (1975) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1975.03260230069032 · Cited by 731
CLASSIC DESCRIPTIONS OF DISEASE
MAJOR, R. H. (1933) · The American Journal of the Medical Sciences · doi:10.1097/00000441-193306000-00026 · Cited by 259
Antimicrobial activity of vascular plants
Nickell, L. G. (1959) · Economic Botany · doi:10.1007/bf02885664 · Cited by 113
Cited by
Moist Wound Healing with Commonly Available Dressings
Nuutila, K., & Eriksson, E. (2021) · Advances in Wound Care · doi:10.1089/wound.2020.1232 · Cited by 630
Honey as a topical treatment for wounds
Jull, A. B., Cullum, N., Dumville, J. C., Westby, M. J., Deshpande, S., & Walker, N. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd005083.pub4 · Cited by 521
Chronic wounds: Current status, available strategies and emerging therapeutic solutions
Las Heras, K., Igartua, M., Santos-Vizcaino, E., & Hernandez, R. M. (2020) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.09.039 · Cited by 370
Honey for Wound Healing, Ulcers, and Burns; Data Supporting Its Use in Clinical Practice
Al-Waili, N., Salom, K., & Al-Ghamdi, A. A. (2011) · The Scientific World JOURNAL · doi:10.1100/tsw.2011.78 · Cited by 314
Metadata
- Authors
- Forrest, R. D.
- Venue
- Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1982-03
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 198-205
- ISSN
- 0141-0768 (ISSN-L)
- 1758-1095
- OpenAlex
- W1642110923
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 42.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Early History of Wound Treatment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/014107688207500310
- The paper
- Forrest, R. D. (1982). Early History of Wound Treatment. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1177/014107688207500310
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.