The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Moist Wound Healing with Commonly Available Dressings
Open accessAbstract
Significance: A moist wound environment has several benefits that result in faster and better quality of healing. It facilitates autolytic debridement, reduces pain, reduces scarring, activates collagen synthesis, facilitates and promotes keratinocyte migration over the wound surface, and supports the presence and function of nutrients, growth factors, and other soluble mediators in the wound microenvironment. Recent Advances: Wound dressings can be utilized to create, maintain, and control a moist environment for healing. Moist wound dressings can be divided into films, foams, hydrocolloids, hydrogels, and alginates. We are also including negative pressure wound therapy systems in the moist dressings. Critical Issues: An optimal wound dressing should provide a moist environment and have an optimal water vapor transmission rate (WVTR) and absorptive capacity. It should also protect the wound against trauma and contamination and be easy to apply, painless to remove, and esthetically acceptable or even pleasing. Future Directions: Interventions, particularly dressing changes, by medical caregivers are labor intensive and expensive and there should be a continuous effort to reduce their number per week. Smart dressings with integrated microsensors and delivery capabilities that would allow wireless real-time monitoring and treatment of the wound would be very advantageous. This way the state of the wound as well as the wear time of the dressing could be assessed without dressing removal or visit to the wound care center. In addition, an ability to adjust the WVTRs to the exudate level of the wound (or having a large absorptive capacity without changing the WVTR) would be useful. This feature would guarantee an optimal level of hydration of the wound surface throughout the treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gurtner, G. C., Werner, S., Barrandon, Y., & Longaker, M. T. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07039 · Cited by 6,542
WINTER, G. D. (1962) · Nature · doi:10.1038/193293a0 · Cited by 2,253
Wound Microbiology and Associated Approaches to Wound Management
Bowler, P. G., Duerden, B. I., & Armstrong, D. G. (2001) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.14.2.244-269.2001 · Cited by 1,634
Dhivya, S., Padma, V. V., & Santhini, E. (2015) · BioMedicine · doi:10.7603/s40681-015-0022-9 · Cited by 1,526
Extracellular Matrix Reorganization During Wound Healing and Its Impact on Abnormal Scarring
Xue, M., & Jackson, C. J. (2015) · Advances in Wound Care · doi:10.1089/wound.2013.0485 · Cited by 1,468
Evaluation of an in situ forming hydrogel wound dressing based on oxidized alginate and gelatin
Balakrishnan, B., Mohanty, M., Umashankar, P. R., & Jayakrishnan, A. (2005) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.04.012 · Cited by 959
Honey: its medicinal property and antibacterial activity
Mandal, M. D., & Mandal, S. (2011) · Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/s2221-1691(11)60016-6 · Cited by 893
Wound Dressings and Comparative Effectiveness Data
Sood, A., Granick, M. S., & Tomaselli, N. L. (2014) · Advances in Wound Care · doi:10.1089/wound.2012.0401 · Cited by 795
Effect of Air Exposure and Occlusion on Experimental Human Skin Wounds
HINMAN, C. D., & MAIBACH, H. (1963) · Nature · doi:10.1038/200377a0 · Cited by 711
Jones, V., Grey, J. E., & Harding, K. G. (2006) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7544.777 · Cited by 525
Cited by
Chronic wounds: Treatment consensus
Eriksson, E., Liu, P. Y., Schultz, G. S., Martins‐Green, M. M., Tanaka, R., Weir, D., Gould, L. J., Armstrong, D. G., Gibbons, G. W., Wolcott, R., et al. (2022) · Wound Repair and Regeneration · doi:10.1111/wrr.12994 · Cited by 412
Self-citationElectrospun Medicated Nanofibers for Wound Healing: Review
Liu, X., Xu, H., Zhang, M., & Yu, D.-G. (2021) · Membranes · doi:10.3390/membranes11100770 · Cited by 311
Metadata
- Authors
- Nuutila, K., & Eriksson, E.
- Venue
- Advances in Wound Care
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2021-12-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 685-698
- ISSN
- 2162-1918 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-1934
- OpenAlex
- W3082630715
- Cited by
- 630
- References
- 58
- FWCI
- 14.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Moist Wound Healing with Commonly Available Dressings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/wound.2020.1232
- The paper
- Nuutila, K., & Eriksson, E. (2021). Moist Wound Healing with Commonly Available Dressings. Advances in Wound Care. https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2020.1232
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.