Reducing Teacher Burnout by Increasing Student Engagement: A Children's Rights Approach
Abstract
Teacher burnout has long been understood to have significant negative effects on teaching efficacy. Research has indicated that student misbehaviour, often a result of disengagement, is a major predictor of teacher burnout. In part to address student disengagement, Hampshire County in England has undertaken a whole-school rights-based reform initiative called Rights, Respect and Responsibility (RRR). This study was designed to examine the effects of RRR on student engagement and teacher burnout over a three-year period. The sample initially comprised a total of 15 schools (four infant, five primary and six junior) and 127 teachers. At the second time of measure, one year later, the sample was reduced to 69 teachers from 13 of the schools. At both times teachers completed the following measures: the Maslach Burnout Inventory, the perceived effect of RRR on teaching, and student engagement. In the third year of the study we obtained data on the Maslach Burnout Inventory from 100 teachers at 12 of the schools. Findings suggest that RRR can improve student engagement and reduce teacher burnout. Of particular note was the predictive power of student participation in the classroom and school in reducing teacher burnout.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The bulk of evidence connecting teacher burnout to student outcomes is not direct.
“In particular, most of the evidence demonstrating a link between teacher burnout and student outcomes is indirect (Covell, McNeil, & Howe, 2009; Jennings & Greenburg, 2009).”
From Too Stressed to Teach? Teaching Quality, Student Engagement, and IEP Outcomes (2017) · cites this paper as Covell, McNeil, & Howe, 2009
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Burnout syndrome in secondary school teachers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
García-Carmona, M., Marín, M. D., & Aguayo, R. (2019) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-018-9471-9 · Cited by 370 · see citing works
Too Stressed to Teach? Teaching Quality, Student Engagement, and IEP Outcomes
Wong, V. W., Ruble, L. A., Yu, Y., & McGrew, J. H. (2017) · Exceptional Children · doi:10.1177/0014402917690729 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
“…2006; Klusmann, Kunter, Trautwein, Lüdtke, & Baumert, 2008), teacher behavior (Irvin, Hume, Boyd, McBee, & Odom, 2013), student participation (Covell et al., 2009), student motivation (Shen et al., 2015), and teacher burnout have been reported, correlations between teacher burnout and…”
BackgroundChen, M., Zhou, C., Wang, Y., & Li, Y. (2022) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-022-10989-7 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
- Authors
- Covell, K., McNeil, J. K., & Howe, R. B.
- Affiliations
- Cape Breton University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Covell, Katherine
- McNeil, Justin K.
- Howe, R. Brian
- ORCID
- Howe, R. Brian
- Venue
- School Psychology International
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-06
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 282-290
- ISSN
- 0143-0343 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7374
- OpenAlex
- W2153843392
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 14.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- School Psychology International (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Keywords
- teacher burnout, student engagement, student disengagement, student misbehavior, rights-based education, comprehensive school reform, student participation, elementary school, teacher self-efficacy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review