Cited by 80Occupational Health and BurnoutStress and Burnout ResearchTeacher Education and Leadership Studies

Reducing Teacher Burnout by Increasing Student Engagement: A Children's Rights Approach

Covell, Katherine, McNeil, Justin K., Howe, R. Brian·2009·School Psychology International

Abstract

Teacher burnout has long been understood to have significant negative effects on teaching efficacy. Research has indicated that student misbehaviour, often a result of disengagement, is a major predictor of teacher burnout. In part to address student disengagement, Hampshire County in England has undertaken a whole-school rights-based reform initiative called Rights, Respect and Responsibility (RRR). This study was designed to examine the effects of RRR on student engagement and teacher burnout over a three-year period. The sample initially comprised a total of 15 schools (four infant, five primary and six junior) and 127 teachers. At the second time of measure, one year later, the sample was reduced to 69 teachers from 13 of the schools. At both times teachers completed the following measures: the Maslach Burnout Inventory, the perceived effect of RRR on teaching, and student engagement. In the third year of the study we obtained data on the Maslach Burnout Inventory from 100 teachers at 12 of the schools. Findings suggest that RRR can improve student engagement and reduce teacher burnout. Of particular note was the predictive power of student participation in the classroom and school in reducing teacher burnout.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0143034309106496

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The bulk of evidence connecting teacher burnout to student outcomes is not direct.

    “In particular, most of the evidence demonstrating a link between teacher burnout and student outcomes is indirect (Covell, McNeil, & Howe, 2009; Jennings & Greenburg, 2009).”

    From Too Stressed to Teach? Teaching Quality, Student Engagement, and IEP Outcomes (2017) · cites this paper as Covell, McNeil, & Howe, 2009

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Covell, K., McNeil, J. K., & Howe, R. B.
Affiliations
Cape Breton University (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Covell, Katherine
  • McNeil, Justin K.
  • Howe, R. Brian
Venue
School Psychology International
Published
2009-06
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
282-290
ISSN
  • 0143-0343 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7374
OpenAlex
W2153843392
Cited by
80
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
14.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
School Psychology International (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Keywords
teacher burnout, student engagement, student disengagement, student misbehavior, rights-based education, comprehensive school reform, student participation, elementary school, teacher self-efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review