Cited by 22Occupational Health and BurnoutTechnostress in Professional SettingsStress and Burnout Research

The role of school ICT construction and teacher information literacy in reducing teacher burnout: Based on SEM and fsQCA

Chen, Min, Zhou, Chi, Wang, Yiming, Li, Yating·2022·Education and Information Technologies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10639-022-10989-7

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, M., Zhou, C., Wang, Y., & Li, Y.
Affiliations
Central China Normal University (CN)
Corresponding author
Li, Yating
Venue
Education and Information Technologies
Published
2022-03-15
Volume
27
Issue
6
Pages
8751-8770
ISSN
  • 1360-2357 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7608
OpenAlex
W4220950376
Cited by
22
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2
FWCI
6.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Education and Information Technologies (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61907018, 62177026)
  • Humanities and Social Science Fund of Ministry of Education of China (18YJC880005)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Technostress in Professional Settings
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
Keywords
teacher burnout, teacher information literacy, ICT policy, mediating effect, basic education teachers, school development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review